From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RzeMO-0001AZ-2u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:17:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9FC0E0EE7; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5104E0B30 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pw0-f53.google.com (mail-pw0-f53.google.com [209.85.160.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mattst88) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B19B1B400D for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbrq13 with SMTP id rq13so8342203pbb.40 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:16:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mattst88@gentoo.org designates 10.68.73.138 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.73.138; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mattst88@gentoo.org designates 10.68.73.138 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mattst88@gentoo.org Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.73.138]) by 10.68.73.138 with SMTP id l10mr68645913pbv.22.1329787015267 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:16:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.73.138 with SMTP id l10mr56536897pbv.22.1329787015254; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:16:55 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.218.4 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:16:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120220190313.57892cfa@gentoo.org> References: <1329770054.21166.12.camel@belkin4> <20120220190313.57892cfa@gentoo.org> From: Matt Turner Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:16:35 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: fcd09892-1741-44a5-88fa-edd517d66647 X-Archives-Hash: 18c28c35b61b190d8189b2848ec082be On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100 > Pacho Ramos wrote: > >> I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are >> preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near >> stabilization)? >> >> I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for >> testing purposes :-/ > > Grub is the only blocker. =A0I don't want to unmask something that makes > people's systems unbootable. > > I'm also out of ideas and open to suggestions. Is it a bad idea to go ahead and unmask it on architectures that don't use = grub?