From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF3C0138350 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07690E0B3B; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF106E0824 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-f50.google.com with SMTP id nv1so9045492ejb.0 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:25:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubwtynxNByM+3kSGxlAbd95d7ziy1ar3Whpjdz1pVZcV5/OdTPt 3q92JKlNAr76V5ZuQ9B/58NXj9mRoetXuSmuNbM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKS83O5gLiqTO6DMpp5S8ptQ5Nk+QhOG11xEzXuwwp53xRSYlIBtA7vC2eIrRj2UBfJ5+d+KDHxYggKz1rIq68= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:808:: with SMTP id e8mr17570214ejd.372.1587414331826; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:25:31 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200419204050.947191-1-marecki@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: From: Matt Turner Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:25:19 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Have x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers use an ICD loader To: gentoo development Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: b6616ca6-d116-47c7-9ef8-71bd7b3dbaa8 X-Archives-Hash: 44806687f7d650eece20cb853f247af4 On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 5:14 AM Marek Szuba wrote: > > On 2020-04-20 06:13, Joonas Niilola wrote: > > > He has been on devaway for a while. > > > > I would've much rather seen the differences between -r0 -r1 ebuilds to > > focus on what is actually done there. Not that I have any say what will > > be done in the end, but it's easier for the eyes... > > Indeed, that is a bit of a problem with revbumps. That said, jer did > update the ebuilds today (jer: thank you!) so no list review will be > required after all... > > OpenCL status update: looks like we are good to go, I'll run some tests > to confirm that there are no obvious issues with the deptree and > assuming there aren't, will unleash the whole thing (by which I mean > "post the news item and unmask the updated loader packages") on the > unsuspecting public this weekend. Great! Thank you so much for your work on this.