From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-85737-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 828C6138334
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 19:20:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F47DE09B0;
	Wed, 22 Aug 2018 19:20:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B979EE0974
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 19:20:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-it0-f43.google.com (mail-it0-f43.google.com [209.85.214.43])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C469335C94
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 19:20:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-it0-f43.google.com with SMTP id p81-v6so4444654itp.1
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:20:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BNHjDH7yvCpbB2CO6PYzfD7nDKRY3pZF2KHzpJrJI2CQmRhzzV
	DcMqyhJDdbkH2MAx82jDUZ0q7BuntBr3EXABgPA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZWRiX55B1br8UIXVSk2bclewTjnhm9XY2kELYe2pC3oBg3XEf9HvzZOKpEds7p6oQ35O3e4hz7eUBGBp/zEYk=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:a886:: with SMTP id l6-v6mr6429393jam.105.1534965624172;
 Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5cc35530-3d96-1a0f-b484-73ea3d58bed5@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <5cc35530-3d96-1a0f-b484-73ea3d58bed5@gentoo.org>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:20:11 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAEdQ38EC2=7d05tnSR9ArGuC0S=no=Q3KkNs8ueZTKzfvkLx7g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38EC2=7d05tnSR9ArGuC0S=no=Q3KkNs8ueZTKzfvkLx7g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo i486 support
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: Gentoo x86 AT <x86@gentoo.org>, release@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Archives-Salt: 25c522d5-21bc-44f1-ad22-835b65acc9c1
X-Archives-Hash: 1400045097ea6154ff96f24ca0f5bf2d

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:26 AM Ben Kohler <bkohler@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 2) Patch catalyst to start setting CXXFLAGS again.  Rather than roll
> back to exactly CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" again, it's been suggested that we
> start setting COMMON_FLAGS, and CFLAGS="${COMMON_FLAGS}"
> CXXFLAGS=${COMMON_FLAGS}" etc.  I prepared such a patch a while back
> [4], which seems to work but may need a bit of updating.
[snip]
> [2]
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/catalyst.git/commit/?id=b409bd9bb4b50f69a555e4e148057ade86a7ed16

I don't think that was intentional, was it?

That commit looks like it's supposed to just be a plain refactor (It's
titled "stagebase.py: Refactor the *FLAGS handling code in
chroot_setup()" after all) so it shouldn't have changed behavior. I'm
guessing the commit is just broken. It doesn't even look like the
commit message was finished when it was pushed.

I think you should do whatever is required to fix catalyst brokenness.