From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F337138247 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 828A4E0B61; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B5A2E0B4F for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id w61so2249059wes.16 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:05:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=edjz9y8A14+ts8zQKzu6uU4bW0uoUUojvFh3iZXBcJ4=; b=GhGMnUZHlCiE0+u1G42lJAe6QYi03LH0nAhZcD/FOi8B8kXywZqBB6dVvo2PPeZvzL MDqM1uXf37MVdlH3g0oUSXKI0SiWN2I4ivW6FYLrn+OsNIzIGiGwk0+5Rut4xanorjng UghGsXXvDwDI6l6mxLLE/1aQSR03HeA19AogsCLwRnarPG/6VPikzyfsVFdqULIB0Wju hHiYKf55GLuCGkvWfVdiLvfJmqnVmjZl4Dk6ByoGZ1s0WADgqS2xwQMzl58LSsL4dHTC GmFGtFbiaBTM2JH6N+5OEq996Eqhj0wH6E2WB/W1Nm0Ov7dWPTxA1Wr0klOpOxZijH+G YP5A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnbjos3G51G50O2hSY4K3JFmIPuA/IoLuRTKukAygeHVaZpjEh/Ial5HhSqtG9JXXPa7kc9 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.92.109 with SMTP id cl13mr18489319wjb.13.1389553512050; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:05:12 -0800 (PST) Sender: matthew.summers@liquidustech.com Received: by 10.194.59.200 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:05:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140112015347.5baf1bc0@caribou.gateway.pace.com> References: <20140112015347.5baf1bc0@caribou.gateway.pace.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:05:11 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bUTYl6LC-MZtqaj2HQUg-iFvlTs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap? From: Matthew Summers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: b82b952a-0318-43dd-9aaa-b98b76d3da82 X-Archives-Hash: 7adaf073915ae22e66f553f27d94e602 On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > fortran: > Do we want to keep enabling fortran by default? The majority of users will > never get the urge to install a fortran package, and the fortran eclass handles > those that do. I think it should be treated as all the other optional > languages and disabled by default, but I'd like to know if there are other > opinions. > If you do disable fortran by default, please make a news item, if you don't mind. I know this will effect some percentage of our scientific user base (including myself). Thanks! Matt Matthew Summers Gentoo Foundation Inc. GPG: 111B C438 35FA EDB5 B5D3 736F 45EE 5DC0 0878 9D46