From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-48568-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1RPNIX-0003VU-LH
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:47:45 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4126D21C045;
Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:47:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AC921C027
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:47:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ggnv2 with SMTP id v2so6588956ggn.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:47:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=l86WWoSIQDta8Iva6MhhJunKflhwM16j2u4HkY0uD3k=;
b=T9js4P+v9auVDEWFZJU+y8ULK5brOhFKOPztmDjifw19UdB0RCpmQa6RF2vTx4ItdZ
ZbN69Hit3gz9Fgex4w5bhbyEgg2SRzbgx/7ZnFCPa3+03aWXhS9Vzh7J2sId2mGQ+VMU
RQi0ApVyqzCF1ccu/L8wDZWudIfx0Fima+9IU=
Received: by 10.182.69.52 with SMTP id b20mr3886980obu.58.1321141633155; Sat,
12 Nov 2011 15:47:13 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.150.3 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:46:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201111121840.16686.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <4EB4FA98.3080201@gentoo.org> <4EBD42EE.4060104@gentoo.org>
<4EBEF208.5060500@gentoo.org> <201111121840.16686.vapier@gentoo.org>
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 05:16:52 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: GVsbU1q6wE_m8N2eBmd0oTpJ0L4
Message-ID: <CADqQcK5Aj3YGFThZdvq8knbr-VyD-oGZx=rSObq0hc4suBMJUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] have portage be quiet by default
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 3e2fa743-c861-4b54-8587-919aba1a6925
X-Archives-Hash: 101cecc816a076cc87e39a85abd52d9a
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Saturday 12 November 2011 17:24:08 Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> Lots of people in #gentoo are unhappy with it.
>
> most changes people will be unhappy with because it's different
>
This is objectively true. That's why you weigh changes based on
whether they yield a net gain.
I don't have strong opinions about this, but from the beginning, I've
thought that *always* showing verbose output in emerge wasn't really
useful for general users except as a CPU-intensive screensaver.
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team