From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-47720-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1R5GzQ-0002a0-Oq
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:00:59 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3481421C1B7;
	Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:00:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B3021C0D9
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:59:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so5298045gxk.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=103A3iW38klUTPnBSWlpqw7q6xKiLDxChrXox9CVC1I=;
        b=tNxWJpzVzQoW7fWhm05npylQD9T0ejNyut02FXWAxGEPjSJdMKaGN2rmcYj/fV3fl7
         e7vEDmoPVCGntVskaoZg3akvX24X8qqn+AkKLMtMfLVYMzt5lGVvr+obHkxDY6SL356I
         /Z5MRkBAsbRO0ytV8fqY2a+zdWRswMYG5h3qU=
Received: by 10.150.209.18 with SMTP id h18mr1235339ybg.430.1316350798086;
 Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.151.79.13 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110918144958.6dc836ce@pomiocik.lan>
References: <1740055.XA9oyAS8HQ@eve> <4E7252A1.2000300@gentoo.org>
 <1336457.yNbGUQDlCr@eve> <4E7584E8.2080009@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_nQ8en2d54G2kW-+1xV_AQMmQcVsqaH0TY_JS5FACpp_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110918144958.6dc836ce@pomiocik.lan>
From: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:29:37 +0530
X-Google-Sender-Auth: yowPW4oqOjwqCCIaGIuP5-w9yfA
Message-ID: <CADqQcK4pxTb_Z9wFY7dduWdSN03LsmvsEXFCEHnxahBPXuOXbA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev and /usr
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: rich0@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 3706a6254edbc3f656d07332d2694855

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gentoo.org>=
 wrote:
> No, there isn't anything traumatic. The only thing systemd folks are
> doing is nicely asking devs to include systemd unit files whenever
> necessary or use the eclass whenever upstream supplies those files.
>
> In other words, some devs just found themselves a scapegoat.
>

++

I'm astonished by the large amount of misinformation that is being
spread around about systemd. If this originated on the gentoo-user
mailing list, I'm disappointed that Gentoo users wouldn't do some
basic research.

I kind of expect this kind of trigger-happy FUD from websites like
omgubuntu, but surely Gentoo folk are more mature.

--=20
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team