From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RJck2-0006XC-Bd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:04:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A64D21C038; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F5B21C025 for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 03:03:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnp2 with SMTP id p2so4313628ggn.40 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:03:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=YQAb4ladgFy3eWwSapqYZrb3bW0zbhwGPZekSNCs3AA=; b=vX8seEJWFfS/NxcoOavcVVYu8w6AVCIKuFm+Qae/HonJcNidO8mViCJt2nHWsQm0oq 0BJYxY4X9McBLZ/2NQykwS21HHlRYG5JMIKZupyBL6v6PGnCFi/8ssZFBpYQJvOrPXB1 Z1GY/FOD3VKfZQn8s/q3Enl3hZvfRlRWTggGo= Received: by 10.150.140.16 with SMTP id n16mr767269ybd.76.1319771017089; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.151.144.18 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:03:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111027174707.21c6cdbe@gentoo.org> References: <4EA91E7E.4000902@gentoo.org> <4EA98204.4030601@gentoo.org> <20111027174707.21c6cdbe@gentoo.org> From: Nirbheek Chauhan Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:33:16 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: L_2QNSxxL1IC3xbvxSWYcH8J8SI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: hardened glibc and gcc dependencies To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: ac2ad76c692316259e345801ef6600c6 On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 5:17 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 23:03:12 +0530 > Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > >> So, I honestly see no reason why toolchain should not start using EAPI 2. > > I await your patch to toolchain.eclass. :P > Sure, whenever I'm feeling particularly masochistic and have devalued my sanity, I'll be sure to spend a few days on that... ;) -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team