From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B71B1382C5 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 18:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5963BE0CB1; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 18:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ua0-x241.google.com (mail-ua0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06E8FE0B7B for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 18:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-x241.google.com with SMTP id t6so17332374ual.7 for ; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 10:14:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0cvzPkr03Iz8GPAW2ypoWpjqHjGJ4gCOqXvzPpPBdLQ=; b=slQu7vggQUvZM/laJ6SX8h+j1tFtxZccY4eThqEnhlBRl4CHnJHJzwHtLU0wNooiby dHGE4xEo24lbNhSORwebJxzh+baZFDGD0J8meA4t6nfYS1Z3xxuSSqNFaNw2xJXATJoE ZwKJp72GqEAOSi1gaAv9C7ksBUWzealnZ/Van+k0yL0pwVrjog9FHAaS8pjA520rxfKN JQtL1K2euNLBrpWOCPP2mOrak12vUvs6u/XYRQ0N2n0R9sa9PrMZrUAiyiTJpM8lRTOL cVJcLLWxdL/71qJVwMuv4o4gj8N6xauVFXXM5PVO0G2BqkHYUMQF02s3fMmqVIP/3W/R iMvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=0cvzPkr03Iz8GPAW2ypoWpjqHjGJ4gCOqXvzPpPBdLQ=; b=ICHogBZFO8D7Re6UsQbXu2/V/A2OCOUva5zgDgQTn+ZIO1ZJQJbOfW2wc9L49Txkkr f/aMPZYWkl6WNBSwmKLpRbIJd7MS0LtFDfbo4in4dguJ4FjV93tkBWnCousJBWg0LGmz kg6/JQRUYMqsIsFYAWSyCnT1V0ZxjiBV64jCbuPKmezoBsy7OriG5QBadTmGhu/q3NHP a6iiwfShiqUc94I2eIqT5qbyH1ZBugwdpRmrg6Q1IxEExC3GurHbYPpRtRVcDo+0t1lx rgcBpEop5J8VXlUhAlfRjwRP6bia39MdFz2juN9ab9/MQI2WKwdnH1JZeC46tSYnNssB E+7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytc/EdDe7xBS9a30wHfzUmy2HP1v4G9LVRD8pZCEp21mg9vI9wvd O6lg+7b4/C7F7tck3NrHBZWLeeS0yL9OEB9RCe0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226q2laWOLcT4jcUGP1ZeNjsEaDcZODbjAdswwrfstwSfLh9UristyS33C+mlo95CcLeHUKT8aVDlhZj6C94l60= X-Received: by 10.176.83.203 with SMTP id l11mr40414878uaa.167.1517768084742; Sun, 04 Feb 2018 10:14:44 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.79.83 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 10:14:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.103.79.83 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 10:14:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <71358ee6-0b56-d18e-9a5a-3d06feb8771f@gmail.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 12:14:44 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] reproducible builds To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e36c88ae798056466eb9c" X-Archives-Salt: b0058038-9ed1-4657-93eb-1dba37c5c50e X-Archives-Hash: 5c1c6033546dd0136cef631e72af1872 --f403045e36c88ae798056466eb9c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Feb 4, 2018 12:04, "Matt Turner" wrote: On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Hi, > > I send this email to know the opinion of gentoo developers about > registering gentoo profiles in the context of reproducible-builds.org Reproducible builds makes sense when you're distributing binaries to users. That's not typically the case with Gentoo. What would this even mean in the context of a source-based distro? It would mean that we all could reproduce the exact same bugs given the CFLAGS/USE/etc. combination. Many groups are working on this from different fronts; if the results stabilize at some point, Gentoo could use that to at least give the users the option of enabling reproducible builds. Regards. --f403045e36c88ae798056466eb9c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Feb 4, 20= 18 12:04, "Matt Turner" <mattst88@gentoo.org> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Samuel Bernardo
<samuelbernardo.mail@gm= ail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I send this email to know the opinion of gentoo developers about
> registering gentoo profiles in the context of reproducible-builds= .org

Reproducible builds makes sense when you're distributing binaries= to
users. That's not typically the case with Gentoo.

What would this even mean in the context of a source-based distro?

It woul= d mean that we all could reproduce the exact same bugs given the CFLAGS/USE= /etc. combination.

Many = groups are working on this from different fronts; if the results stabilize = at some point, Gentoo could use that to at least give the users the option = of enabling reproducible builds.

Regards.=C2=A0
--f403045e36c88ae798056466eb9c--