From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-48192-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1REQSB-0002Vn-9O
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:56:27 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99AD021C05A;
	Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:56:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0188E0509
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:55:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwg14 with SMTP id 14so2051926wwg.10
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=MZn/8qoHWCyFEbDwAThA3to07K5H7EVJyqFNY9dxTJQ=;
        b=VYXum9nNCsL4XSZX0dhQ0qJlfEbi1kdt+vR+6hh1fCK/btNp0qiltr+jUyb7aCmw7L
         SPPxhHIO2G3CB8M2COhuV5FgeMfO8Z8y2/7tVGCmrGEGr2uI2puqfwO6OkdNP7pOxbL+
         bENygHJn2PNTUcc8ETe7qM6M/L3DH/213mVtI=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.183.70 with SMTP id p48mr1561703wem.109.1318532146016;
 Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.234.130 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201110131302.24766.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <20111012044023.GA8203@waltdnes.org>
	<CAGfcS_mCY8FZigoM-rBidp3-O_L14x5YxAJkPsosrGWa8kQhgA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAO38tUpi7iOiRHiJ01kxnJ4UfeNSBHson13dWvViwWYDXeCb3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<201110131302.24766.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:55:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CADPrc82P+OG8h=700zduab7TM8Bv_fEGjUAdkVM=3oEo=dDaAw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev
From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= <caneko@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: b739d3afad75f3e6f8452fbddceed4e0

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 October 2011 12:30:06 Arun Raghavan wrote:
>> While I've seen a lot of whining about this whole issue, I certainly
>> haven't been seen any effort to actually solve the problem within the
>> existing framework. For example, if someone cares enough, why not
>> write a wrapper script to track down the programs and libraries at
>> runtime that actually do use /usr so it's easier to say "these
>> packages install rules that need / and /usr on the same partition".
>
> (1) udev has provided a workaround of sorts for this already: udevadm tri=
gger
> --type=3Dfailed. =C2=A0this is the udev-postmount init.d script. =C2=A0(2=
) it's fairly
> trivial to locate most (all?) the failing rules with a single grep: grep =
/usr
> -R /lib/udev/rules.d/.

If this comment is true (haven't looked at the code):

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D375263#c23

that trigger has been removed from udev.

Regards.
--=20
Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n
Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico