Il giorno dom 24 nov 2019 alle ore 13:20 Benda Xu <heroxbd@gentoo.org> ha
scritto:

>
>
>
> Given the python-2 countdown deadline being 2020-01-01, a month away,
> shall we get rid of python-2?
>
> yes please as much as possible.
In my experience most server instances can live without py2 at all (after
clang 9).
In desktop world thare are very few, but important packages that still
require it.
The Gimp being one prominent example



>
> If the answer is yes, we will need to decide on the following
> python-2-only packages.
>
> ,----
> | $ comm -23 <(equery -qC h python_targets_python2_7 | sort ) <(equery -qC
> h python_targets_python3_6 | sort)
> | dev-lang/yasm-1.3.0
> | dev-libs/libxslt-1.1.33-r1
> | dev-python/backports-functools-lru-cache-1.5
> | dev-python/enum34-1.1.6-r1
> | dev-python/functools32-3.2.3
> | dev-python/futures-3.2.0
> | dev-python/pygobject-2.28.6-r55
> | dev-python/pygtk-2.24.0-r4
> | dev-python/subprocess32-3.2.7
> | dev-util/boost-build-1.70.0
> | dev-vcs/subversion-1.12.2
> | gnome-base/libglade-2.6.4-r2
> | net-analyzer/nmap-7.70
> | sys-devel/clang-8.0.1
> | x11-wm/xpra-2.4.3
> `----
>
"As much as possible" IMHO exclude at least yasm, libxslt and nmap



>
> If the answer is no, to avoid holding back new versions having only
> python3, such as bug 671796 for dev-python/matplotlib bump, old versions
> with python_targets_python2_7 and new versions without should be
> co-installable into different SLOTs.
>

whatever your (gentoo dev) choice  I wish you good luck