From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C65138638 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B90D721C086; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com (mail-qc0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE69021C00E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 23:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id b40so2763249qcq.38 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:17:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=BedB+Wg7X/zStFQf4f9BmVNsD9+D1uwfDJk4g0Thcxk=; b=fMeAis8Bp1oNsVrVBvnFwo+p2Rrjl/OsOSvw2LCGf0exbbSS9GkVy/ojD7iLNamdbB fapssB5wWlWlUOH2v7W1M+R3O7z6beS+glR+aFDN39mgupimFl8iqIhcypRR6cwF0hhT 8fuJWehsJOA+Cic+QuCy53VbXvVoZV2Dx/kdCHUtYPWC6vEScEQ5jOKvshs9++162z8o sWfmoEQR75q0pV+ktbQgA08fN6cYtvwYF2uyJihInY3hycSYHhIz5m3L+u1EZdWjdG6f 5j77qNFfCU1mhwBGMfYn3D+3QQVOkekygOqQsiGJcTegohifw6rE+9wotbBVYfa5fPGP FuPg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.200.6 with SMTP id eu6mr3556502qab.62.1358983062868; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:17:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.70.164 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:17:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50FE1425.2040900@gentoo.org> <50FE302A.1040600@gentoo.org> <50FEA78A.70806@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:17:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: CONFIG_CHECK_FATAL, making CONFIG_CHECKS fatal by default From: Francesco Riosa To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fb0fdb7d2f204d3fce61e X-Archives-Salt: 06b1acbe-4224-4a13-a624-a20ca2b38b99 X-Archives-Hash: 376dcde2aa89ede3cdc5cbafa110665f --20cf300fb0fdb7d2f204d3fce61e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 2013/1/23 Fabio Erculiani > I think that the problem is that it is trying to be smart when it's > not really possible (unless you want to cover all the corner cases, > which is a pain). > > > Hum, but if we could not be smart enough we can at least try to be very annoying. what about a delay of some seconds, exactly like `emerge -C portage` or something very similar? Trying to cover the corner cases but without pretend to be omniscent? --20cf300fb0fdb7d2f204d3fce61e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2013/1/23 Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@gentoo.org>=
I think that the problem is that it is trying to be smart when it's
not really possible (unless you want to cover all the corner cases,
which is a pain).


Hum, but if we could not be smart enough w= e can at least try to be very annoying.
what about a delay of some secon= ds, exactly like `emerge -C portage` or something very similar?
Trying t= o cover the corner cases but without pretend to be omniscent?

--20cf300fb0fdb7d2f204d3fce61e--