From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3982138334 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 20:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99B76E0929; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 20:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt1-f170.google.com (mail-qt1-f170.google.com [209.85.160.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09216E0858 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 20:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-f170.google.com with SMTP id y39so25898633qty.0 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 12:05:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=X3Qftf2PwUpd5KsxZBW4Z0sA8itPHs3fxs1OBjGcMHw=; b=ulSwCmhhCi108iZwUqeyOm7EXkNnA6/A1zZ2RTh7WLZdfVu+daeYux/gZsN11BMW6E AvpGkThP3XWp2wwTl0ldhGkASdgxho/xaaIfItF3tjp2FzMPqWB8TGjktZbj+1hJdDKJ THxWMcbImdYgAQdUNCXMURhsuj3gTRC/vWT3epvkm6uJ7VxlEMQMmrBTs85dJqNQLuSj RrnvkwowbpCaL/caL5evFQPMORhoohHjN0+kXieY1+sELazOyYfhR0C8/nMTzQIpNPU/ o2YgVjaGpiAbp3Tdmgm5p+q+FtvanwakV21NJuoPKFtv09jgB9+AnYS+lbJ7QNCbuWdr 9nmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWPKk6VaDFeF6WykQAB9EmX7KiX4YHazrTa67/aPpYQJdKAFzbE hytd+7lmeTFVGxnbRM4oWMHcpZth6qhI4CoDmKTsZ7uA X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx6OTZwXGcb737WMvDycXN8rSUUcgph+OfnemHN1qn++0k/NKMmfV/P3+s/PLv6VJdpH2PspEqRz0+Q62XnWA8= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:482d:: with SMTP id h13mr24368948qvy.68.1572897930909; Mon, 04 Nov 2019 12:05:30 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <33564bf19f26e1f99d9efca5d1c15c079c01e3d9.camel@gentoo.org> <0ec1a891bcba8e1ca780d585c2134d0b7e4100ea.camel@gentoo.org> <72cb9df3-8e05-c192-3b3e-3e2977e1a9ee@gentoo.org> <20191104192643.GA8436@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> In-Reply-To: <20191104192643.GA8436@whubbs1.dev.av1.gaikai.org> From: Michael Jones Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 14:05:19 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Do (old-ish) Portage QA checks comprise policy? To: William Hubbs Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000070aceb05968ad6c0" X-Archives-Salt: 0aabc668-e536-426d-9ad4-66f722b6d793 X-Archives-Hash: 60b5b3b5f8240d63725b207d7bd8f49d --00000000000070aceb05968ad6c0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:26 PM William Hubbs wrote: > That way is not building static libraries at all. If we go that way as > a distro the support for forcing static libraries into /usr/lib* is not > needed because we would just not allow static libraries. > As an end user, I would be unhappy if static libraries were no longer supported at all. I use them regularly for my development work. --00000000000070aceb05968ad6c0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:26 PM Willia= m Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org&= gt; wrote:
=C2= =A0That way is not building static libraries at all. If we go that way as =C2=A0a distro the support for forcing static libraries into /usr/lib* is n= ot
=C2=A0needed because we would just not allow static libraries.

As an end user, I would be unhappy if static librar= ies were no longer supported at all. I use them regularly for my developmen= t work.
=C2=A0
--00000000000070aceb05968ad6c0--