From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7652D138CA4 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 587EAE081E; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com [209.85.212.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DCD9E07DB for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 19:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so30525824wid.0 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:11:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=arlcYgnSd8jtAnrUMJGwJ3rp3DkJvs5Py0ucCdGcutk=; b=LhsF3E/tanTHOR7qxhexsno3rIIr/hj8Ke7e2RY/oS+YwLyKjrt+UuGNY5P8lPd25J BBwwo8/ZMwvrf77u/TPqIGpeGCx1iGK1+iS9m+yQSZ08vzVbHTAA8HCYrhnjJ8w878Rk +lX4vWj3+SUGj+18HckuOe0sg3d3h5ufIKguh6sJb3nNX604f1DlP2iKeH1Moq4fE2+7 qP5rROOs5S+g4AFQA8I29fryy7xiW7/Jmp/t2EeWoEe99B5J29rdiF4Zcs+NcdIwFd4p Fcm9iZaYEihzHRQ6dKOmoUUMr14M5H7vJkBUg3zKnBvTwh926vJUBWg5bnEg87dIFyay htpQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.99.67 with SMTP id eo3mr6536931wib.28.1429902669088; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:11:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kolmax94@gmail.com Received: by 10.28.145.139 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:11:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <553A91F6.7080505@gentoo.org> References: <20150424194217.0176adc0@googlemail.com> <553A91F6.7080505@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 22:11:09 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gP9iZ2vNy9-dS-TFEnRor07K6Fs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: c++14 global USE flag From: Maxim Koltsov To: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" , =?UTF-8?B?0JPQtdC+0YDQs9C40Lkg0KDRg9C00L7QuQ==?= <0xd34df00d@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428fd6a78d7505147d283b X-Archives-Salt: 517ebafb-5fce-46af-8bb4-b3afca1b83e6 X-Archives-Hash: 3a25c08db705aab2bc6811f9833d7e6f --f46d04428fd6a78d7505147d283b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2015-04-24 21:56 GMT+03:00 Ian Stakenvicius : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 24/04/15 02:42 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:12:32 +0300 Maxim Koltsov > > wrote: > >> Hello. My previous email was sent from the wrong address and it > >> seems it did not make it into the list. Sending again from the > >> right address... > >> > >> I'm introducing "c++14" use flag to every package in > >> app-leechcraft catherogy via leechcraft.eclass. I need to put USE > >> description somewhere. I propose / ask for permission to do it in > >> global use.desc. Putting this flag to every single metadata.xml > >> feels just wrong --- there are 72 of them now. > >> > >> Proposed description: "Build using C++ 14 standard" > >> > >> Looking forward for comments. > > > > This isn't going to be sustainable... What's the long-term plan > > for dealing with this? > > > > Sounds like we need to go through the archives and revisit the > conversations about how to integrate c++11 , again.. > > This is temporal, until gcc gets needed support and that version makes its way into ~. Then the flag won't be needed anymore, we'll just depend on new enough gcc and enable C++14 mode by default. I'm CCing LeechCraft author just in case. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iF4EAREIAAYFAlU6kfYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCDuQEAhAv0boCkTU3RvT5d/fX3la7V > 8so0wqnPtHKI4fSqEwgA+wXmVlB14ykbTQ1VnrRR5WrEPRjMbm9V1MSXAA6MnC43 > =i/3U > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --f46d04428fd6a78d7505147d283b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


2015-04-24 21:56 GMT+03:00 Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org>:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 24/04/15 02:42 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:12:32 +0300 Maxim Koltsov
> <maksbotan@gentoo.org&g= t; wrote:
>> Hello. My previous email was sent from the wrong address and it >> seems it did not make it into the list. Sending again from the
>> right address...
>>
>> I'm introducing "c++14" use flag to every package in=
>> app-leechcraft catherogy via leechcraft.eclass. I need to put USE<= br> >> description somewhere. I propose / ask for permission to do it in<= br> >> global use.desc. Putting this flag to every single metadata.xml >> feels just wrong --- there are 72 of them now.
>>
>> Proposed description: "Build using C++ 14 standard"
>>
>> Looking forward for comments.
>
> This isn't going to be sustainable... What's the long-term pla= n
> for dealing with this?
>

Sounds like we need to go through the archives and revisit the<= br> conversations about how to integrate c++11 , again..

This is temporal, until gcc gets needed support and t= hat version makes its way into ~. Then the flag won't be needed anymore= , we'll just depend on new enough gcc and enable C++14 mode by default.=

I'm CCing LeechCraft author just in case.

=C2=A0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iF4EAREIAAYFAlU6kfYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCDuQEAhAv0boCkTU3RvT5d/fX3la7V
8so0wqnPtHKI4fSqEwgA+wXmVlB14ykbTQ1VnrRR5WrEPRjMbm9V1MSXAA6MnC43
=3Di/3U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--f46d04428fd6a78d7505147d283b--