From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59021-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317EF198005
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed,  6 Mar 2013 07:08:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD393E04E7;
	Wed,  6 Mar 2013 07:07:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73F94E031D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  6 Mar 2013 07:07:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so7612888wey.0
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:07:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=MUjUJfdep9RPZikpjlPBndaQKd0yBSjScy0xnyx3bUs=;
        b=Kk/zafkHpRWbOz0FQ5xAil57kMV7gEGWEuilTFUK8XzOicSg/i65UjNNp8XEIvGFxB
         ul/4hp0LCBBUqAg3F49i/vFud9J7QE2Q7WHXQmOVnctCOpJ/yLRbUAj/slEmENJWL7P2
         i2AbuKvIGYAZqvE96bxo45yJIty3JIKfqOe/jKq4iMISCAkhbS3ohke3reFJHiHTSHB1
         CEvmdw+4oaAcBc5rZZ8aUxbacTTl++3JiFWGb+TMb/LTX6mOI4OnZ91ViU+2ExOWmx/x
         nwqTY/AFlt/SYyxymvS10JuPVqNsy3TVxKQpGrZaiMK0UvEIxJcUewSs40e3TYoGa0QZ
         2CxQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.173.167 with SMTP id bl7mr44622046wjc.50.1362553677063;
 Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:07:57 -0800 (PST)
Sender: kolmax94@gmail.com
Received: by 10.180.19.229 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 23:07:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:07:56 +0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: IS1lEznUz9DweRnw5nOh2AiLAlg
Message-ID: <CAB_Kkxx4OfRcJe82ji-FWLm1nH_FJfF9CAekyQxp6XZFP+K_5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for LeechCraft
From: Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@gentoo.org>
To: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e010d8510e8b12f04d73c3feb
X-Archives-Salt: 277ec7f3-db3f-4acc-b828-fe6aa0fc928a
X-Archives-Hash: e856de8e81cd7a92e98d7e88c7519d1a

--089e010d8510e8b12f04d73c3feb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,
Currently there are 61 leechcraft packages in tree scattered across several
categories. We propose to move them to one new category to make maintaining
easy as well as rsync --exclude'ing.
So, two questions:
1) Do you agree with adding new category?
2) How should we call it: app-leechcraft, leechcraft-base or anything else?

Thanks,
Maxim.

--089e010d8510e8b12f04d73c3feb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

<div dir="ltr"><div style>Hi,</div><div style>Currently there are 61 leechcraft packages in tree scattered across several categories. We propose to move them to one new category to make maintaining easy as well as rsync --exclude&#39;ing.</div>
<div style>So, two questions:</div><div style>1) Do you agree with adding new category?</div><div style>2) How should we call it: app-leechcraft, leechcraft-base or anything else?</div><div style><br>Thanks,</div><div style>
Maxim.</div></div>

--089e010d8510e8b12f04d73c3feb--