From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F456198005 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D9BDE072E; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74151E05AF for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 15:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hq4so350341wib.6 for ; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:12:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sHhKYT2FNqaLDGxImSqOdT/yyxRWPkNz1Gy2s52+lFk=; b=L0ABMMm8SnIgrHICB2IZLWAm1rn0+/UzKZ4PKV/yNBKDyIPpJ4V106lqImuR/NE99D jexuDxYh1f5Skz5n/fyWt2ywIXHj75D5KH0mcm33Jf6CQVdfNYynNbZZIZSZDrvfU7HX zGHP6iZXydBRG5wrcUD418oHYhoPAGvgRduw715H68rUmn61701JwjaMW+g/3E0pqsSf FBiSSqc7wj4wnSb/xPoQzAZqGlmQAF6L1W60MueKFCJVCOW+mYa+HJK2Khl0FANO0UrN 71jiGajYemwTQWz3xSuzyXRDlxZabGnKb7/nM0MfW8WwTWbaodadab2zI5k8R5FDz5yt 3ywQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.82.34 with SMTP id f2mr29767719wjy.25.1362582745982; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:12:25 -0800 (PST) Sender: kolmax94@gmail.com Received: by 10.180.19.229 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 07:12:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <513756E6.9070008@flameeyes.eu> References: <51370D86.1000909@flameeyes.eu> <1451129.ekiScJE063@drakkar> <51374D7B.9020501@flameeyes.eu> <513756E6.9070008@flameeyes.eu> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 19:12:25 +0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -FJIalSEQoyN064qeGJKsTmKkQw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category for LeechCraft From: Maxim Koltsov To: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 56ea7049-9206-45f5-b1c5-875f9c6b04d9 X-Archives-Hash: 6306100b437114372ece41461d79adff 2013/3/6 Diego Elio Petten=F2 : > On 06/03/2013 15:23, Rich Freeman wrote: >> Can't say I'm likely to be a leechcraft user, but the original >> proposal indicated they were up to 60 now, and had at least 10-20 more >> in the works. I don't think a category is unreasonable, and if at >> some point in time popularity wanes and it needs treecleaning it makes >> the whole task that much easier... > > I would have said no for 61 (as I would have expected them to wane, as > you said) =97 for 100 I'm fine, if that's happening. So, what have we decided? I'm pretty sure it'll go up to 100 quite soon. > -- > Diego Elio Petten=F2 =97 Flameeyes > flameeyes@flameeyes.eu =97 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ >