From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860BE1395EA for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 06:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CFF5E08FA; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 06:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (mail-io0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93192E08DA for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 06:38:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ioii16 with SMTP id i16so40120598ioi.0 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 23:38:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ZHXLUM4bpOSIg8DxcNbr+2bUeElhRqbyzkAZfmb4PMI=; b=sY60TtUCxTNLVE1zvOYmbZM2Repi+WZapF0iHhoweqm4JjaVE3VJeqqHloVbQmda0L GSWB8J/z9HceltA8k6IYqBEgzEKPJUpc+7bp6DtUynXw3NC0Tfo85CijQvBQnFTIa4B2 55mOeuCIpUX2v5mKsK8xNig2gkeA9HXKXtYn4rN5PUuPhiJX7khWNia7sT8y3I4AA273 Y5ACAd8f1qz+K3J5fikSbeu4EaHRZt7IlV+nht4AuuIIhGWYqFVFtshsBUL0bhWMqajX fU4hUPbuqEbBvK6zRrKZwWe1Out6JyWkJ2Y1MOzqne/EZxQqcDFMpSAfJ3HpqU4P6k5a mwhQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.17.13 with SMTP id z13mr9575422ioi.97.1438756705930; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 23:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Sender: yngwin@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.106.228 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 23:38:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55C0D2BA.6090909@gentoo.org> References: <20150802203354.1f6ba9254be090487ec48380@gentoo.org> <55BF196B.5090905@gentoo.org> <55C0D2BA.6090909@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:38:25 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2aoQE5O0-piF-pPpFCHqynB30A0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] useflag policies From: Ben de Groot To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 5e931110-8f30-4480-943b-92f44d3311e9 X-Archives-Hash: a404e5d35b95bb3700117225634ae06b On 4 August 2015 at 22:56, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > Are there any cases where things actually break if a package has both > flags enabled? IE, is three a package with IUSE="qt4 qt5" that when > both flags are enabled would build for qt5 only, and happens to be a > dependency atom of something else that needs it to have qt4 support? > That to me is the only case where a REQUIRED_USE needs to be set on a > package. I'm not aware we have such a package, but I may be overlooking something. Either way, I think it is a dangerous road to go down that way. -- Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer