From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Sk8AX-0003yw-La for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:25:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC127E06B5; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FF0E055C for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 06:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so2789622lbb.40 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:24:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KlsCnNA9k6N/aRsj6shPWaa/VtGY9I4K907XHIIMdso=; b=tLAiqvW+pJhcmX2fieu1O91rdztPt6MxwNDrzt5Bphhng9LCxpUMRInHaUOwYjTqlD HWzV+MLQvZqjCY0P/6DcWk2ILdKu7DhhVur/DPhKx9zS05U8hou0YaFd8Ow1lwdAPMtm 9AKGDbAIBqjdCtlep0kcP0yCV7xtNe50I7kw7Urrl3SU6zAAx0J597rLDOewGjXPNPS+ QO5/0BX40Y6mHrlPzHzIzn/FBV1n0xz95ZPvdC1qnvP02rUY80sP2WNE+GZ9s/fyyCPA zhcwEbVIETFGU3JKyvxxZkPRDbNqVMkAsz+Fiok6xgKI8zf7aNoJ550pcAZtWqHzDNSt HwAQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.131.68 with SMTP id ok4mr637624lab.47.1340864674719; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: yngwin@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.117.40 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:24:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120623142143.631d7ebf@googlemail.com> <4FE5EB23.5040600@gentoo.org> <20120623171704.4f24cba6@googlemail.com> <4FE5F31E.80608@gentoo.org> <20120623175324.038ca62e@googlemail.com> <1340472237.5979.75.camel@belkin4> <20120623183053.6d432605@googlemail.com> <1340473390.5979.76.camel@belkin4> <20120623184546.56f49e58@googlemail.com> <20120623195413.37fd6507@pomiocik.lan> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:24:33 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: nXnhayF2P_atveJJzCaBO8fO644 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots From: Ben de Groot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 2a0ef487-60ec-4879-bcba-36a35a79909e X-Archives-Hash: ab5096f82f8e2a9d1433671d30d33e3a On 28 June 2012 13:03, Matt Turner wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:45:46 +0100 >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:10 +0200 >>> Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> > > It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will treat "the >>> > > gtk3 version" or "the jruby version" as being newer versions of >>> > > "the gtk2 version" or "the ruby 1.8 version", just as it tries to >>> > > bring in a newer GCC and so on. >>> > >>> > And what problems is that causing for you? >>> >>> The problem is that there's no way of knowing that -r300 is not "a >>> newer version" than -r200 > > It's actually not though, is it? I think -r300 is simply the same > thing as -r200 except that it uses gtk3 instead of gtk2. What it means is that it's the same package and version, but a 100 revisions of the ebuild later. It makes one wonder what the heck is going on there... --=20 Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead