From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SfOiU-0002gV-BM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:05:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F534E0630; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43FDE0774 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so2755122lbb.40 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:03:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IsaC1xG5IypXhYlYi0MHC5ys9Ag7tJbW3IWh6k5NflY=; b=U6Cllr9sbIZME3gCzxI1//SBuFps4bAAvVCqVlSw0JWoeJNFkODfI3X3EXBEtOv+LU Em5ltjn9qYG5hFGx1XjE0mGXfkUZADMLbstCOQVsIjCnp9wrt0MDmcfDKU8CHsFdNpe/ S6pK4XfQXkmvKCDrAOcJnyzA30Cy3tbnymZFj15v76qB0cFVzHkO7pbICxOfsKg3CZBv TSNfpXZkEuNZIvl2aUu37qydi9PNcMKPmd3OIjdI4SPHp7zM3ExjqO4EZBzhC1g5Smrs 9USehNczYze99xCLwb8oYSJLyXWW6BYpTHHD9QjJNReW5di8vaQBMcCfKT84N5hLz5Or HxSA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.40.33 with SMTP id u1mr2035218lbk.28.1339736604656; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:03:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: yngwin@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.117.40 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:03:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120615042810.GA9480@kroah.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:03:24 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LkrwSY2RSxm79Hhht9y4z-DPQ-s Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] UEFI secure boot and Gentoo From: Ben de Groot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 08d07227-340d-48ea-9c65-3aec1985b381 X-Archives-Hash: e70e7dd6268a2f754c73a7c2074ca480 On 15 June 2012 12:45, Arun Raghavan wrote: > On 15 June 2012 09:58, Greg KH wrote: >> So, anyone been thinking about this? =C2=A0I have, and it's not pretty. >> >> Minor details like, "do we have a 'company' that can pay Microsoft to >> sign our bootloader?" is one aspect from the non-technical side that I'v= e >> been wondering about. > > Sounds like something the Gentoo Foundation could do. I'm certainly not the only one who would be averse to paying Microsoft any ransom money. --=20 Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead