From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-61855-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A321381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu,  8 Aug 2013 09:39:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D56AE0ADB;
	Thu,  8 Aug 2013 09:39:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com (mail-pa0-f43.google.com [209.85.220.43])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BA2DE0AA9
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  8 Aug 2013 09:39:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id hz10so3167169pad.30
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 02:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=FhNULr6Ne51KAQ4oFebTFwOZEGBys7I3wd9eTw3ZArw=;
        b=zXsD4wRB6sLbz4bsV9sTY+oyKCYEATisGDxtu87bVwnomI7twZv+NM2Vn6Kbrhvgo6
         PqN9vnNmBhe0xorfh/B03ESqaEVqHO1Bp08d39cCTfYtq6Rn05qRyvD/6UqT2QEeT3dT
         gzIbgmdRwAsk3nCh+QoSCWF7Cx6PHjo5nXeLjv+6Lpy1hZssMrTlGRt9wFgIcYNjsok1
         jfsq+SaQs/hndvszZtDK6fcgB/GS0Pld5LGRO5IMSGWx8aFy7jywydV/A81LRv3VC/BI
         Zk0RJrJxZ4I7JOYmpo4WsT40nleCYK0wfauhrTCpgTs6H8e2vizUgCBDqC/n2XlGh0aa
         BgMw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.169.161 with SMTP id af1mr5198028pbc.22.1375954766030;
 Thu, 08 Aug 2013 02:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: yngwin@gmail.com
Received: by 10.68.62.138 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 02:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5202416C.5@gentoo.org>
References: <5202416C.5@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 17:39:25 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: j_HvE--S7UeE6DbvxxzTltot714
Message-ID: <CAB9SyzRbbDU6xZTaY-A_COmwEYfDkcXhNM0dcq+rm17VvZyAfw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gnome Stabilization 3.6 or 3.8
From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: ed245393-2047-42bd-96e2-b30372d0cbec
X-Archives-Hash: fc567ef0a385100fd9757cd7043d118c

On 7 August 2013 20:45, Michael Weber <xmw@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Gnome Herd decided to target stablilization of 3.8 [1] which requires
> systemd.
>
> What are the reasons to stable 3.8 and not 3.6, a version w/o this
> restriction, enabling all non systemd users to profit from this
> eye-candy as well.
>
> I raise the freedom of choice card here. And deliberately choosing an
> uncooperative version doesn't shine a good light.

People are free to use a saner desktop environment...

-- 
Cheers,

Ben | yngwin
Gentoo developer