From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-53645-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737E813800E
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:11:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52C8121C013;
	Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:11:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52DDE0746
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:10:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vbbfc26 with SMTP id fc26so302054vbb.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=+mpCD0sjFNW5JDs9QXuzpP4+VMXbbMBEQ5IXpPE7rPE=;
        b=BSJbauSJjWWdZDWZsjKAyPcFY3tskPjX5H1QS6lybwYhugowO3WEeodMMbJHS5Al0M
         ISyvOzN12LgGEg8Xl81bqZLNCZ4ZMdY9HX/TX5O7mjgAsRCBva9UVH2N12EvPoVCkIMi
         ced6b6Oyuit9T8TjJHuO157PifS2P9BwIypXd6Ke48meZNjdu9ucY0V3YLH+oe7HgoB8
         1fyHLX6dcNaXdvKDe6MgaNJ26p1lDsQJmXzbqqGz5A2CA2lMPtZdudOG2rmAg+463f3X
         hcdQTUPqvg1+mWZJcOd1UUyJgdxpUIQ7QOPTM4FSwOr2oXpTKBV3fZjQrF95nJaqkNLa
         W6YQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.72.73 with SMTP id b9mr15073172vdv.34.1343196629176; Tue,
 24 Jul 2012 23:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: yngwin@gmail.com
Received: by 10.59.10.133 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:10:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <500EEEFB.1030109@gentoo.org>
References: <500E0158.1060107@gentoo.org>
	<CAGfcS_kR5WpEzDocg_kcukRSnOqOV9HGpj37OC65ZB+Ora420Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120724065436.GP49719@gentoo.org>
	<500E7FFC.8050507@gentoo.org>
	<20120724110744.GA24104@gentoo.org>
	<CAGfcS_mH7MmFOv8JGy5d2DvoqMJMZRALGfEm0DKaGcWqf4xWyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120724113954.GB24104@gentoo.org>
	<CA+czFiDvLek7iCb6bqTYe8ndN-hhDhQ5wK8m=a09APEUvts9UA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120724120907.GC24104@gentoo.org>
	<CAGfcS_kfuep+GyiX7A4sN17jopAC7sTOW=HGB804gjrkZSnqAg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120724133347.GE24104@gentoo.org>
	<500EEEFB.1030109@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:10:29 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 84zEjY7EkdYvilzXMGKAFwR1xok
Message-ID: <CAB9SyzRUT0-XDVjNmfUBW=xQL4D2fqH+yFGVD6YiKeW3YetdKw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: news item: changes to stages (make.conf and make.profile)
From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 11334fb0-18e8-4c4e-b984-db3d9c44cb00
X-Archives-Hash: 12c43bb809e234d1c75c17e7faab6622

On 25 July 2012 02:52, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina <zerochaos@gentoo.org> wrote:
> While I completely understand where Fabian is coming from on all this I
> respectfully disagree.  Long term gentoo users do NOT read the handbook,
> ever.  I still install new systems with odd hacks that I picked up when
> gentoo was versioned 1.x and it pleases me, I don't care if those steps
> are not in the docs anymore or discouraged or whatever.  I've not even
> glanced at the handbook for years, yet I've installed gentoo on dozens
> of systems since the last time I did.
>
> This is a big enough change that it will throw users who do not know,
> and my first impression of /etc/make.conf et all missing on a new stage
> is "file a bug report for a broken stage and assign it to those morons
> in releng".  (please note the comic exaggeration and not a disrespect).
>
> This is a change that will break all new installs and expecting
> experienced gentoo users to read the handbook is simply a fantasy.
> Please, keep the news item.

+1

This is an important enough change to inform users about.

-- 
Cheers,

Ben | yngwin
Gentoo developer
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin