From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB387138010 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 04:10:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E8E721C081; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 04:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B4F21C03D for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 04:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbbfc21 with SMTP id fc21so760992vbb.40 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:09:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BwskBsM0zNvbJpsOi63smtA45DNftyhbargzepqjdAM=; b=KgyW9iTGPt5bM4i1A4lk6S3WUvUS0/zvvs4F4fc+rN4t3i29vO8AkYrJixYNwnZW2l EAJ/wS1GJmgNnmiR6c5xpdjGzRkwMf/DIY+UA5Hu6bKBqsKEARvSZmEWARkvMt3E3ium OqSkBwaBhpjXXCaoXcRljaC2YRb38yz7vycxK/hM1KXR/brR4y6jPSXJYy2hnO9pZIMK UQ99YJupPXKzUGO1dOezuLHjmVY543sD+ErJC/wIJQb/Q/z0HfWLnXFhpRO2jiw71vAJ RVijEdur9cZ5Ny2ea+g9bmjLW5Addn5yg6QfBEOw+1Q17pJxlZtWWR8+iwe675/Z3dTY SiJQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.22.41 with SMTP id a9mr1103470vdf.9.1348027764572; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:09:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: yngwin@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.58.110 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:09:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120918224033.1fa8c1bd@pomiocik.lan> References: <20120916135211.GC23030@localhost> <20120918102551.500ff19b@pomiocik.lan> <20120918092426.GA5384@localhost> <20568.16682.31115.233591@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120918110637.GF5384@localhost> <20568.25833.33593.344770@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120918220606.45bde58c@pomiocik.lan> <20120918211110.72d9c0b2@googlemail.com> <20120918222256.548078ba@pomiocik.lan> <20120918212717.39e802f2@googlemail.com> <20120918224033.1fa8c1bd@pomiocik.lan> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:09:24 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Re4us62cKw2HKLSkB6ReIdDOZGk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal From: Ben de Groot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 52338e7d-766f-4e34-bb96-d3fbc3b3eed3 X-Archives-Hash: d4a2b378a961cd551bb5f2b2c3057263 On 19 September 2012 04:40, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrot= e: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:27:17 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:22:56 +0200 >> Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:11:10 +0100 >> > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:06:06 +0200 >> > > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> > > > So far, I'm not sure if there was a single, complete, exact >> > > > problem discussed which is solved by this syntax other than >> > > > cosmetics. >> > > >> > > Perhaps you should read the GLEP then. >> > >> > Thanks for your comprehensive answer. Could you point me, please, >> > where is there a real, current, exact problem described? >> >> "Motivation / Rationale" > > Thanks again, I can read. Now, which one is a problem which currently > exists in Gentoo, is exactly described and is not a cosmetic problem? There isn't one in the current GLEP. --=20 Cheers, Ben | yngwin Gentoo developer Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin