From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55FCD158020 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 16:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81443E08BB; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 16:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E24BE089C for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 16:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id j23so2885255lji.8 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:01:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XistPZvb36hdHabnTnqgYcIcKXphr7g0qN5kxdU/e8o=; b=oTkzYRUDaRVeB0sK8+mSq7Uj8BACQVBLIJ0G1sllUj7w8eD5XXXyOsejVMGFc62CFg fiDruOQo91wJsWfjRoEJkJ07PgKj990oCO5L8EARaDHYeNLS2LT4wzWtci2YFgAWRcfy guJxjR4XnDoew0dQUHM+b4Ds5QPtVPD+nlDBzv3tlB3dkR0pZ8bFVIGSqtLcnE9CFkNa wuj+SZH+Hg6qlz4vAagzYNsjezT8ed6AsXx1uJp5vF6H734fC00heHDEX+dTD4oSuj6B OuY7wQPO5xj2zHk0DztQ53rifzjIyqdv23RqAevC1w0uH2ujY8DObO7F3zmW2XXi8QRX HYew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XistPZvb36hdHabnTnqgYcIcKXphr7g0qN5kxdU/e8o=; b=qDiEJ5ijKu+txlnAUNbfk9dU6tGbxaKxPAlF3RBcDX2Mvl7aGCcObfIpIc0urwejZG 90NO6E6Hr2SBLYVCArLMf59pL3+OXLmyZCJszb4hBZQzjcH+fb2wzP4ejJj/WgIZqZzi 8a4Kzufhc0al41zRcKIHkmNJGwBKOrw8LTDl1Fb6Ubaqf39RgfQHiqzcBhxayBip/SlW fNRVOffNS4dBcVgbk2LRXQ5VKpJMbugtbQFrYihidAmyTkq/lzMqpQ7J9KI+4cixp57a 1uYb0n9czYtgn4gZ7XtHelfb/IaVxlyMN2FPJva2RLoOnoUtk8n3vRv2TORtmmd+Roaa zz+w== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3UptGaaQB0H1ZecNjDAKfJ5rycVIsUALIT0+srCmZlyLb0tJVC XmKfhixhL4+bbe9fL2gyEmN6kk0KkzC1xKsSGdFI++Afnro= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7cAmuYQKQigpjy0j2OzLBaUmngeDPLEKlvbNGTaXWtc6ThT1xgmtr0CjdbpMOkHStf8LPJPv9YWy8n9jAMX4M= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:179e:b0:26f:cba5:8ea1 with SMTP id bn30-20020a05651c179e00b0026fcba58ea1mr211186ljb.241.1665676911432; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 09:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jeff Gazso Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 12:01:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-dev] Fintech Packages To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009dda9c05eaeca0a8" X-Archives-Salt: a3173989-60f3-4d4d-aec4-1e4819a2ebaa X-Archives-Hash: 3bd4b6ebcdefa72df33f3428aa0f9150 --0000000000009dda9c05eaeca0a8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" It looks like cryptocurrency related packages are ending up in one of two places: net-misc or net-p2p. The latter seems to be by virtue of the fact that, as an implementation detail, most cryptocurrency networks are peer-to-peer in nature. A (very) cursory look at the Gentoo ebuild repository shows: net-misc/bfgminer net-misc/electron-cash net-misc/electrum net-misc/electrum-ltc net-p2p/bitcoin-cli net-p2p/bitcoind net-p2p/bitcoin-qt net-p2p/litecoind There are probably more, but this is what I could find quickly and easily. Wouldn't it make more sense to silo these ebuilds (and similar) under something like fintech instead? ~Jeff --0000000000009dda9c05eaeca0a8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It looks like cryptocurrency related packages are ending u= p in one of two
places: net-misc or net-p2p. The latter seems to be by = virtue of the fact that,
as an implementation detail, most cryptocurren= cy networks are peer-to-peer in
nature.

A (very) cursory look at= the Gentoo ebuild repository shows:

net-misc/bfgminer
net-misc/e= lectron-cash
net-misc/electrum
net-misc/electrum-ltc
net-p2p/bitco= in-cli
net-p2p/bitcoind
net-p2p/bitcoin-qt
net-p2p/litecoind
There are probably more, but this is what I could find quickly and easily= .
Wouldn't it make more sense to silo these ebuilds (and similar) u= nder something
like fintech instead?

~Jef= f
--0000000000009dda9c05eaeca0a8--