From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB27158094 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 21:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87F2FE0BA6; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 21:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BD44E0A8F for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 21:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id u24so10824039edb.9 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:49:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=vFjeWQd1oFGwiSV6dsTu+I0ixzxKHGTmHhIfwljfNME=; b=PqDaLNu6ZgOHoyEZVTrxg2li6rSl1lVg8ddNfvi6xH8v8pWC04Xktm6I1OXFoQ/X2q Rq739e1KB4AqjfnlTbWJJ5B+Q+bELRl+Nkil8diFegtY/V0+zQioqsGVVgIK2Uo+NGDJ yQANEtGUsd7ZPo615gDyqIjzppbjhj3M0zuvw4pBz9Bq1nQjiVrzfhQph8biu9qLbKJN PMhtRC1prt4Tax4ZaiTCYBhzkUsxFPT5LEeK0gnkejBO2fLVwUOuqICBCE9hv43KtPSN BbcoS3uNyvk9zhyNoeChWknetzHY0NcYlSbLdPqQktp4c3Nf/zk1waCVJZOMBecf55Ak Tr9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=vFjeWQd1oFGwiSV6dsTu+I0ixzxKHGTmHhIfwljfNME=; b=nt+1EYtT7dLMG94hP0K4AluocMFkDwOwCsti9iBeEHU1VYlhUZkmgvbu4j2nNwItWV Sj5y3HqCuAOgHAgKlPMgvdc0XbCH/AKN/bEb8j0TKmaGGseiXlpzfvOIyC8Eaxo7DVcG I0A05sGCoPj58uSH6iOkiOkOedFeTbfy52FaXCRwruptxcp73seFA8kBJ3K+LbQ57K12 Z+zW2WEMTb/mUGGujhJWpXMLjeOc3kYzIDqKD4ba29uSk9/zTHnpPBTWInIU5kONWWV+ z25ySJZfGTWZXuXlH50FZibh+/4Hxekbh2vFOcWQ0yx9pmInja5bR8rc7yK42riHq076 4vlw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf23Zz/E2FrtIpJo7abCGxQgtRnApfEldCCYlYIhNhuZOrFAZQoU na3qmkOnfVEBl3L3pFayCiNG4GD0kM1/SWUwRdCnuaL0WfZ7Lg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM42E41za1oVJ3fwb8mO1YR6qMgIWF2HsVXHSIz1d8SBaFsGQHiDye6Ye16wMTeYXCNNm+B+/yUiGLhV/f8+3Ls= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:da4f:0:b0:44e:864b:7a3e with SMTP id w15-20020aa7da4f000000b0044e864b7a3emr24928070eds.378.1664228993076; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <353fb606-e5a2-6785-43fe-3632a694340e@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: From: Jeff Gazso Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 17:49:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/electrum-ltc To: Arthur Zamarin Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f5115505e99b8189" X-Archives-Salt: f8c5a4e2-4b42-4567-87bb-e43f612c6975 X-Archives-Hash: 118ffc991db548045ecab301b9c8d6cc --000000000000f5115505e99b8189 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" After some trial and error, I managed to modernize the old net-misc/electrum-ltc ebuild based upon the net-misc/electrum ebuild code. I still need to tweak a few things, but it's basically done. I am not (yet) a Gentoo dev, how do I move forward with the revised ebuild? On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 12:22 PM Arthur Zamarin wrote: > On 10/09/2022 18.49, Jeff Gazso wrote: > > This one caught me by surprise. > > > > So, it looks like the versions of net-misc/electrum (the Bitcoin client) > > in Gentoo's repository are in pretty good shape. The version of > > net-misc/electrum-ltc (the Litecoin client) in the Gentoo repository > > looks like it's two years old. (For those who are unfamiliar the > > Litecoin client is downstream of the Bitcoin client, both projects share > > a lot of the same code.) I checked upstream and the current version of > > electrum-ltc appears to have been bumped to Python 3.8 and it looks like > > the old aiorpcX (#792219) issue that was causing such a headache has > > also been fixed as of a PR this past February. See my note in #792219. > > Looks like you are correct, but note that we currently have 3.10 as > stable version, so electrum-ltc should be at least that version. > > > Pardon my ignorance, but couldn't this package be salvaged by > > repurposing the net-misc/electrum ebuild code to bring the > > net-misc/electrum-ltc package current? Is the situation more complicated > > than that? > > If any user manages to fix the issues mentioned in last rite message > (mainly bump to at least 3.10 python target), I would gladly cancel the > last-rite and mask. > If you do it, please ping me in the PR, and I would gladly review it. > > Those last-rites I did today are mainly for those packages that were > stuck in only 3.8, had a bug open for 7-10 month already. If any > maintainer can fix those ebuilds, I would happily revert the last-rite. > > > ~Jeff > > -- > Arthur Zamarin > arthurzam@gentoo.org > Gentoo Linux developer (Python, Arch Teams, pkgcore stack, GURU) > > --000000000000f5115505e99b8189 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
After some trial and error, I managed to modernize the old=
net-misc/electrum-ltc ebuild based upon the net-misc/electrum ebuild co= de.
I still need to tweak a few things, but it's basically done.
=
I am not (yet) a Gentoo dev, how do I move forward with the revise= d
ebuild?

On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 12:22 PM Arthur Zamar= in <arthurzam@gentoo.org>= wrote:
On 10/09= /2022 18.49, Jeff Gazso wrote:
> This one caught me by surprise.
>
> So, it looks like the versions of net-misc/electrum (the Bitcoin clien= t)
> in Gentoo's repository are in pretty good shape. The version of > net-misc/electrum-ltc (the Litecoin client) in the Gentoo repository > looks like it's two years old. (For those who are unfamiliar the > Litecoin client is downstream of the Bitcoin client, both projects sha= re
> a lot of the same code.) I checked upstream and the current version of=
> electrum-ltc appears to have been bumped to Python 3.8 and it looks li= ke
> the old aiorpcX (#792219) issue that was causing such a headache has > also been fixed as of a PR this past February. See my note in #792219.=

Looks like you are correct, but note that we currently have 3.10 as
stable version, so electrum-ltc should be at least that version.

> Pardon my ignorance, but couldn't this package be salvaged by
> repurposing the net-misc/electrum ebuild code to bring the
> net-misc/electrum-ltc package current? Is the situation more complicat= ed
> than that?

If any user manages to fix the issues mentioned in last rite message
(mainly bump to at least 3.10 python target), I would gladly cancel the
last-rite and mask.
If you do it, please ping me in the PR, and I would gladly review it.

Those last-rites I did today are mainly for those packages that were
stuck in only 3.8, had a bug open for 7-10 month already. If any
maintainer can fix those ebuilds, I would happily revert the last-rite.

> ~Jeff

--
Arthur Zamarin
arthurzam@gentoo.= org
Gentoo Linux developer (Python, Arch Teams, pkgcore stack, GURU)

--000000000000f5115505e99b8189--