From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 563CF158012 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 15:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 390D3E0958; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 15:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141C7E0928 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 15:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id b16so6759024edd.4 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 08:49:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=rRaOvUlbgQTfU5MrkVM2ENPqOvW3++5ESC0QQzvFcXE=; b=aletbmYGJQymq7ibkmrGJ6p1RudFDa8BunW1jX0f9AUxfqb39Q4Iuq5UfUBU9EPqbp E0oGNEIFl28Q2xDRpTeRp75uEPUoxDUBLq45MIU9juk3mRna2Toiy72OLiwsxWJm850T nMkggwbmSfVHG/YRdp7BgTi4TazpnLJMvrL1Ck6ohBI7D/oPSwu5+FxxdRocgunqTJ6e 5YQmc06xfQ44YWVwWxD93JFLHRdswcA2HMHKb1zvW1sD29+PFJUWFpMcTGUn6gjnQDOq RSYhh/jn/OU4+lnyhNmRoRNj9aNFZk5Gx2WaJ/HJ+eXNtZMHBrwAjAbUdUi6tbaKxM21 OnxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=rRaOvUlbgQTfU5MrkVM2ENPqOvW3++5ESC0QQzvFcXE=; b=ctdGb0/SYs59DTEoreR3yp6AY0glDgGTM+NsdIafCnpq+5tk2n7yP8fXvnbeengbOS FN/e7pVvZC9UyWKpevfNAO5xKZCetwX6MXvYWnx0YbeaTdUlLvW96V0PrQ3UAcM1NGzI a3n2WU/A2h1IWsIbBpnKOyGfSBnRPEA0NZUOF1uC2+kX6Cda6+rz4MA3LMvZJhglXjqR giAiRn23jtc7XmYXPptXNBCjIIObRyFiJYSMT217PWDn1gqEog5xQ51X5u+fI59grctL 5aX2HLRWaZRkIf06PoyMAp7HWVV1OnijcXhOb0shOAeHQI3jvwg6ijIPIC2Ps6BT8CoR k1LQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0f8uJAy3+hy19l3y9dEZAk8aaXC0ArVLzExyH91VuEb4mgodg4 8eHIwSUF7+0cWp4W/JZngs0S39c/Tc0lFKOab6RL+AY/0ee/Fw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR77sjeD4SOUCGKRDqQBwzdjKmhJRuYAEYenxzU5wn6i6yV76SNVOQkmC0HOPnjA4kNhU74kKC0fiLIyqTY3Kng= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d3d3:0:b0:44e:baab:54d9 with SMTP id o19-20020aa7d3d3000000b0044ebaab54d9mr15586484edr.43.1662824977726; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 08:49:37 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <353fb606-e5a2-6785-43fe-3632a694340e@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <353fb606-e5a2-6785-43fe-3632a694340e@gentoo.org> From: Jeff Gazso Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 11:49:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/electrum-ltc To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001effc405e8549cc3" X-Archives-Salt: 7d77a308-1caa-41b0-a3e9-5df70e958160 X-Archives-Hash: 26da5f91fa536944bc474ed3bc637b7e --0000000000001effc405e8549cc3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" This one caught me by surprise. So, it looks like the versions of net-misc/electrum (the Bitcoin client) in Gentoo's repository are in pretty good shape. The version of net-misc/electrum-ltc (the Litecoin client) in the Gentoo repository looks like it's two years old. (For those who are unfamiliar the Litecoin client is downstream of the Bitcoin client, both projects share a lot of the same code.) I checked upstream and the current version of electrum-ltc appears to have been bumped to Python 3.8 and it looks like the old aiorpcX (#792219) issue that was causing such a headache has also been fixed as of a PR this past February. See my note in #792219. Pardon my ignorance, but couldn't this package be salvaged by repurposing the net-misc/electrum ebuild code to bring the net-misc/electrum-ltc package current? Is the situation more complicated than that? ~Jeff On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 9:21 AM Arthur Zamarin wrote: > # Arthur Zamarin (2022-09-10) > # Python 3.8 only package, with capped old dependencies, and open > # bugs and issues. > # Removal: 2022-10-10. Bugs #869506, #695090, #792219, #809272. > net-misc/electrum-ltc > --0000000000001effc405e8549cc3 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This one caught me by surprise.

<= div>So, it looks like the versions of net-misc/electrum (the Bitcoin client= ) in Gentoo's repository are in pretty good shape. The version of net-m= isc/electrum-ltc (the Litecoin client) in the Gentoo repository looks like = it's two years old. (For those who are unfamiliar the Litecoin client i= s downstream of the Bitcoin client, both projects share a lot of the same c= ode.) I checked upstream and the current version of electrum-ltc appears to= have been bumped to Python 3.8 and it looks like the old aiorpcX (#792219)= issue that was causing such a headache has also been fixed as of a PR this= past February. See my note in #792219.

Pardon my = ignorance, but couldn't this package be salvaged by repurposing the net= -misc/electrum ebuild code to bring the net-misc/electrum-ltc package curre= nt? Is the situation more complicated than that?

~Jeff

On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 9:21 AM Arthur Zamarin <arthurzam@gentoo.org> wrote:
# Arthur Zamarin <= arthurzam@gentoo.= org> (2022-09-10)
# Python 3.8 only package, with capped old dependencies, and open
# bugs and issues.
# Removal: 2022-10-10.=C2=A0 Bugs #869506, #695090, #792219, #809272.
net-misc/electrum-ltc
--0000000000001effc405e8549cc3--