From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EC7138A4E for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:44:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EB8821C04D; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8604A21C049 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id tb18so3409843obb.31 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:44:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=ARNxzWtvRdWxEoxEKHYbjo5REF9Ew+HLDV12+0DV6sg=; b=pD9VeRkilzDkbRco9f/mg0B5uSg7B6B4m8rtDcqpJ1Gn9XbM/8kZBbm4BmCZ7Ie8Bq T1kOyUmb8/O62sXpBLVTUvmkCdSPmHaD5P4Nkw+LutsAvlUKs9si4X++urliAOgiabW6 ZZ4kOOWe/snRlIIcwSIw5iC/8ijFIhlZbU6SNU4s8xWeO8umydtBe/Qm18Rj+cmJ1LHt YZ1TvyHnZrrnPQX32gq0H4cXFQDTQyrjrxlVJ3Qx5baBAH99VXef++r8869n4LkWzvzX vTQAhkGhHoXB26nQlcfgjANS3mgXWb2/sUojSNVfwCfK6pvUUMnf7KKUlc2T3AXkTlmL QnFg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.3.103 with SMTP id b7mr1264276oeb.86.1360921443581; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:44:03 -0800 (PST) Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com Received: by 10.182.84.193 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:44:03 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [75.147.136.182] In-Reply-To: <511D7F2D.1050208@flameeyes.eu> References: <511D5D6D.9010608@gentoo.org> <511D6998.6090804@binarywings.net> <511D7BF3.8070003@flameeyes.eu> <511D7F2D.1050208@flameeyes.eu> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 01:44:03 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cZtlaBqjd3GLTWktyBG9AM1AVoo Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] RFC: Graveyard project From: Alec Warner To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8L3+4S0GGzR2BtoqxoMExEAlvGpNa5CHTEkoA1D1C9pBFIYKdy6gnUbVkoF8f8U7mOSWL X-Archives-Salt: 4e17b1d6-d0a9-4626-9548-90f613d9f87c X-Archives-Hash: 91b98dfd9513dd58677f1fbb157e66e6 On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > On 15/02/2013 01:15, Rich Freeman wrote: >> How? We don't support overlays in the main tree. I could see a >> package maintainer being nice if pinged by an overlay maintainer and >> delaying some change for a short time to let an overlay be updated, >> but issues that impact overlays should not be considered blockers on >> closing bugs on the main tree. > > The problem is when you have to triple-check that the user hasn't > enabled some random fucked up overlay and you have to guess whether that > might be the cause of the problem. Yes it happens, not so rarely. I empathize, but I'm not really sure it is a blocker for this effort. Developers already have to evaluate whether the bug the user filed is legitimate; I don't think this makes that significantly more difficult. As stated. spotting overlay usage is pretty simple as-is. > >> If there is something wrong with the proaudio overlay just don't use >> it. The same would apply to sunset. > > I don't use it; people still report bugs with it. > > -- > Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 =E2=80=94 Flameeyes > flameeyes@flameeyes.eu =E2=80=94 http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ >