From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-58273-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F74C1388E6
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:31:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AB42E04D2;
Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:31:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ia0-f176.google.com (mail-ia0-f176.google.com [209.85.210.176])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21A5DE0484
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:31:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ia0-f176.google.com with SMTP id i18so3062724iac.7
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:31:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:x-received:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to
:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
bh=Ldoa4JxBPcMx0e4B5J5vn2nFJOPABBc9GkZowF1m7ng=;
b=SAUBlFDFL+LXSsj/+qxzRm6kVCmifJhBpCSiJ04BhKqcxLdF9ccr9wy5FX2+zR2YKS
slRjLC2KvOFWzVXEqCW0u0SldmQisJIiwv9+4SANlcHYQ5iiJmQGYQaztogiP90P0MuM
E8Zvyi7+sbJ4tks7QSuhBS7oMRimcx7c2Y1YA9EPjl6Qig9baFKJagpqCsmtRPku3ZnS
TcssvQf4bcbgOaf6pQfjCWLc0i0mzHIPNnSKfNFdwZtrUdNnpX12Oh2E+K6tHyJ1eo3p
hDYb0otIz8rXhzw9Ve3Qp90klHZkxHt03ybaMVEsApAaSGctqXJyseNxv0cKdSl0A8j4
457A==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.56.141 with SMTP id a13mr4278898igq.24.1360254691096;
Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:31:31 -0800 (PST)
Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com
Received: by 10.64.41.165 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:31:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [75.147.136.182]
In-Reply-To: <20755.53570.200814.993392@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
References: <20755.53570.200814.993392@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:31:30 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1EvBueu3QJySZzDjTYiXBZ7CVRY
Message-ID: <CAAr7Pr_j_qO1AEuS2LZTGWKc+50eGndM0cEyyaei4i2v3gabsg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Rename Creative Commons license files?
From: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnUpGRNVp9mDOg9KqcV1KiwD8TxXPBoIz6hm+fy2/XzESavevTYSDmZBBcmLxy4RsAlg6Xc
X-Archives-Salt: 573ef4c6-b64b-4ed4-8961-abed8046bb98
X-Archives-Hash: df66a832d1fabcad3f94e08a597efc84
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I always wondered why we are using such bulky names like
> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 for the Creative Commons licenses,
> instead of CC-BY-SA-2.5 like everyone else. The latter also used by
> our documentation pages and is the name in the SPDX license list [1],
>
> So, while in general I'm against renaming of licenses (e.g., it would
> be pointless to rename our GPL-2 to GPL-2.0 in order to conform to the
> SPDX list), I think that in this case we should get rid of these long
> names which unnecessarily clutter the output of various tools.
ask for forgiveness, not permission ;)
-A
>
> The plan would be as follows:
>
> CC0-1.0-Universal -> CC0-1.0
> CCPL-Attribution-2.0 -> CC-BY-2.0
> CCPL-Attribution-2.5 -> CC-BY-2.5
> CCPL-Attribution-3.0 -> CC-BY-3.0
> CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-2.5 -> CC-BY-ND-2.5
> CCPL-Attribution-NoDerivs-3.0 -> CC-BY-ND-3.0
> CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.0 -> CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0
> CCPL-Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs-2.5 -> CC-BY-NC-ND-2.5
> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.0 -> CC-BY-SA-2.0
> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-2.5 -> CC-BY-SA-2.5
> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-3.0 -> CC-BY-SA-3.0
> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial-2.5 -> CC-BY-NC-SA-2.5
> CCPL-Attribution-ShareAlike-NonCommercial-3.0 -> CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0
> CCPL-Sampling-Plus-1.0 -> CC-Sampling-Plus-1.0
> CCPL-ShareAlike-1.0 -> CC-SA-1.0
>
> In total, about 100 packages are affected. so it's a minor effort.
>
> Ulrich
>
> [1] http://www.spdx.org/licenses/
>