From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-51952-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SXjEc-00017c-7a
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 May 2012 01:22:31 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8450E0752;
	Fri, 25 May 2012 01:22:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA03E073F
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 25 May 2012 01:21:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yenl3 with SMTP id l3so22510yen.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=vBhEFqL/6XlW2UYWX7xmdqIwecLjqFJ3i5VLLyEVQbk=;
        b=cl5D97JjmEn+zMI8KGUOm8CWckBDEaawxo2mADZbnnAVbtWjS5CJEGeZgnQLDWJ22x
         QwmAqJTHmGF2NSv4dIowHPgywdDnx7xMR4IfZ9M+oJZRZ5Lya/MlTx3SDwJCSO36P1je
         g7O2TxwLC1zBjEF+XGHOGiTjlwKdfD7fGjOxysvi2KJdJo1afL6rDTBfy2o3VL8zshNJ
         2LWP5rORyTWgSpVirH9+sxI9zufwD0vQrniepGvL2BToV/1JnbFgnrDg6eGCZMDTTHpH
         c0TN4kSBJYaMDCvprkApG5shT+eguaux77lrjShghEOQhU8lXH3GIGABfh2vKqW2zcn2
         u5pQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.104.170 with SMTP id gf10mr1043710igb.52.1337908897647;
 Thu, 24 May 2012 18:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com
Received: by 10.231.38.199 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:21:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_=JV=f7_X-Jf7cV7J37Kw0wGtyX3jqLia-0s7KK_crH_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4FBCDB3D.1070009@gentoo.org>
	<robbat2-20120523T164346-726762549Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
	<1473095.PKeReGjyol@smorgbox>
	<4FBD5B42.7090809@gentoo.org>
	<CAATnKFCx0P+0nTP1B6LC+LDektPxqRoUCsR9jAJZx9WfV080hQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120524164002.50092941@pomiocik.lan>
	<20120524170224.728c194e@sera-17.lan>
	<CAGfcS_=JV=f7_X-Jf7cV7J37Kw0wGtyX3jqLia-0s7KK_crH_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 03:21:37 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: fbL0rLFYRgp2OTtYulu6jZfTeEk
Message-ID: <CAAr7Pr_ScpynbXUiT5FmeQT29deNv6gHaVXmP+vBDON9-3kerA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
From: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl60j4MBm/ErcI6XY/QLlqkUUg+3uDjKPqhkPJtmWpgtf48WWwCigq5HhsNvqYMXNQJVI53
X-Archives-Salt: 58ceefc1-ab61-4bcb-b9bd-2be693455285
X-Archives-Hash: dcc2bd41143708c77174a80be2145b02

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Ralph Sennhauser <sera@gentoo.org> wrot=
e:
>> Can we keep the master on Gentoo hardware please.
>>
>> Also, there still should be a bug at b.g.o and git format-patch works
>> just fine for that. Maybe it's only github now but how many places is a
>> developer supposed to monitor?
>
> I'm actually a little torn on this one. =C2=A0I'm fine with keeping the
> "master" on Gentoo in the sense that this is where the rsync tree gets
> generated. =C2=A0However, gitbub has a lot of tools like pull requests th=
at
> could potentially improve workflow, especially for things like proxy
> maintainers. =C2=A0So, letting those teams work more outside of Gentoo an=
d
> just push their changes into Gentoo might make sense.

So I'm a bit confused. Is GitHub open source?

>
> Perhaps github should be viewed as a widely-shared overlay that gets
> automatic updates from the main tree in the master branch (or whatever
> we call it). =C2=A0You can work on a branch in github, get it where you
> want it to be, and then push it to Gentoo pretty easily. =C2=A0When I don=
't
> have access to an upstream repository I often just push a copy to a
> fork on Github just to make my own life easier.
>
> Rich
>