From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-83663-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC9D91382C5
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 21:58:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C33EE0B47;
Sat, 27 Jan 2018 21:58:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ua0-x241.google.com (mail-ua0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::241])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EBD5E0B3B
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 21:58:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-x241.google.com with SMTP id z3so2466870uae.12
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:58:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=scriptkitty-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to;
bh=H5TccOxo8+pMihGtIbJhrZ0dAqRWv8IK8ZsCTZJlz94=;
b=0G8JXvuMRYXSYOiMgFWqUZAUb0lNYDEkJpFBgXyqb1t9wVaLCM98s8MJB3H1toLr1a
y2tBV+gOqrlVx+MKsvUlxtsU2s3qSZLdNufZJh0AUkxsd+yR/q6Hez9pLW16VStrPtXc
A2HZzwZoamQwEulL2ll5Y+fbMVbb7EHGigtHPQGJDFTJrXnmKjW6do+TlI6jTdfekOy+
8V9E+Ht/40R0IedMTiN2nPCZmElvOxhrDJAEL9k69HWGrAJpw6+ul+DjYtEdCHsXIght
9IV+wTWwmyVFXfzw1kYckev9hMDhJOG+BZsFF58pypZaujxop/U4k22uvHLYtfyY3P+p
MnsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=H5TccOxo8+pMihGtIbJhrZ0dAqRWv8IK8ZsCTZJlz94=;
b=Aljb7pz33c4ds8YcrAozPo+vmBmABiEynUiLdM9J/duE80WGmSfaAXvuIVDoFmls6n
8oSWEfsN0DxUiRYGNP0+WKQnNCG7SACLdGqOKrbJ+Cmzp9an9OR+MjTPAWaf3IwNUmx9
wRouQV841tIKj7hohQ50LxQloNnp/emh25UlzfMVUafT/iWz3lPE95H0Wc0PHvbXgBfN
z+3rl0bqzx3HQDQhINWPZqMbNCzgNmpAmz9dGfOiukcUBTpJV+VxaPdLwSdOBCyokgMv
eQWiY58Qh8OEeR/5QqT2diOrLcGFXTf2lyOXkHuRm74gDFQ4iKAHcrPDUXQCN3jcd6YL
u0lg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxyteGJIaWaAXS1HI2QaYVUXVS6NOiwUKYi0DQH4ppkn0im/VRHqWk
Kv2LJDWry0gOA9zR35c4z1L+HwJgdmcCO62cwv/MMQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227o08pYrGvZzSHpRUyvQL0fUw1dgEHHmFEr4kpIzJ8TBAzTMYWIaSSVl2ZZ1aWopAem1TZ5U7TiffvSUP3umGo=
X-Received: by 10.176.78.147 with SMTP id l19mr14690356uah.96.1517090325793;
Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:58:45 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com
Received: by 10.176.13.139 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jan 2018 13:58:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [98.116.189.160]
In-Reply-To: <6d36e156-b6f9-b5c9-6b7f-55bdf6afaf00@gentoo.org>
References: <8f38ad26-8aaa-18d4-e266-62adbd4913cc@gentoo.org> <6d36e156-b6f9-b5c9-6b7f-55bdf6afaf00@gentoo.org>
From: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 16:58:45 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: YwAdGMMd9rIA9aR1aWSb-fddZy4
Message-ID: <CAAr7Pr_AOtdGuMciV_cGkdDbRce9yLZFCBDG6isz5V_fK2jbFw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Merge 7 Fedora wallpapers packages to single one
with slots?
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043eb7f4f620d50563c91db3"
X-Archives-Salt: afb324b4-95cb-446b-882b-8aaa8dea30a3
X-Archives-Hash: 083643b3f22499541f7f24e618b9b2b4
--f403043eb7f4f620d50563c91db3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 01/27/2018 11:09 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > I noticed that we have 7 packages on Fedora wallpapers with names that
> > only explain themselves to Fedora insiders:
>
So traditionally we follow upstream package naming. If we aim to deviate,
I'd prefer we have strong reasons for it.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I was thinking that we could merge these packages into a new package
> > "x11-themes/fedora-backgrounds" or so with slots 11 to 16 so that people
> > can still install them in parallel, get slot updates automatically,
> > adding more recent ones does not add more packages, and the package name
> > explains itself.
>
Why not just make x11-themes/fedora-backgrounds, a metapackage that
includes all of the packages?
>
> If you do merge them, then it might be better to use flags for the
> different sub-packages rather than slots. There's no place to describe
> what a slot is for, but having a local USE=solar with a corresponding
> description in metadata.xml is (relatively) discoverable.
>
--f403043eb7f4f620d50563c91db3
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Michael Orlitzky <span dir=3D"ltr">&l=
t;<a href=3D"mailto:mjo@gentoo.org" target=3D"_blank">mjo@gentoo.org</a>>=
;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 =
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>On 01/27/2018 11:09=
AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:<br>
> Hi!<br>
><br>
><br>
> I noticed that we have 7 packages on Fedora wallpapers with names that=
<br>
> only explain themselves to Fedora insiders:<br></span></blockquote><di=
v><br></div><div>So traditionally we follow upstream package naming. If we =
aim to deviate, I'd prefer we have strong reasons for it.</div><div>=C2=
=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;borde=
r-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>
><br>
</span>> ...<br>
<span>><br>
> I was thinking that we could merge these packages into a new package<b=
r>
> "x11-themes/fedora-backgrounds<wbr>" or so with slots 11 to =
16 so that people<br>
> can still install them in parallel, get slot updates automatically,<br=
>
> adding more recent ones does not add more packages, and the package na=
me<br>
> explains itself.<br></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Why not ju=
st make x11-themes/fedora-backgrounds, a metapackage that includes all of t=
he packages?</div><div>=C2=A0<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" st=
yle=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span=
>
<br>
</span>If you do merge them, then it might be better to use flags for the<b=
r>
different sub-packages rather than slots. There's no place to describe<=
br>
what a slot is for, but having a local USE=3Dsolar with a corresponding<br>
description in metadata.xml is (relatively) discoverable.<br></blockquote><=
/div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">=
<br></div></div>
--f403043eb7f4f620d50563c91db3--