From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SI5V6-0006OL-PJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:54:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26AABE0EC8; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE39DE0BDB for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:53:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so1235898wgb.10 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:53:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=gXN7BJ0dQ0lTJUD/tiSs6uIeNT8bM4GEH8tXpqki4D8=; b=DvVTapfDQCdAAu9SxdPs2NXaMsZvZFs6kli+ZML6jwlNISWW3PjV0AKV1FEWF3W5pi Cj5gUB5Iwb4fjRnatpT9ml7Kv2Ai7PZHWTG8JL2MGoBq4QO3NVi67+eSKL0i3T073r/9 pKmAjC2M0hFpfBQzhtSYdW9dSl2uzJFXvmn/dZFiaNYKS6mEvFUGolDjLU4vCU2NN1kc dHv24dUuKKda8wbJkx1WV/syaOHTftisO+gQYJ8eBAXNdHKvkk/2z1wHtWJ9TDJVgBFU usZCkRr+l/xAxvwcdothz5IO4Pf/xnm0+vmxVpvQr1HlXfcm7O0cNrqZYMwUUfY2kBE0 Nt7w== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.228.91 with SMTP id e69mr61981weq.5.1334181222017; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com Received: by 10.227.5.138 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:53:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120411215847.6993e0a8@pomiocik.lan> References: <20120411195345.GA19071@linux1> <20120411215847.6993e0a8@pomiocik.lan> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:53:41 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2yqejnBCEmTUoAzev0q6eF3kJas Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] >= udev-182 tracker From: Alec Warner To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk1yGwvKKcVaxaGuGyYXsQtU5lk+M4NQPRca/Jaqsrxd0kL2DeCeX57yIqZrIRbW13hAG9I X-Archives-Salt: b30eca91-c85c-4561-9511-b31de44b0541 X-Archives-Hash: cf3f21a6ce7406c667d48952326f8c84 On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:53:45 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: > >> All, >> >> here is what I see on the current udev situation: >> >> The council has made a decision that we will continue supporting >> split out /usr. >> >> This, however, was never in question. No one is planning to drop >> support for separate /usr. Also, no one is planning on trying to force >> stabilize udev-182 within 30 days. >> >> To allay any fears of that happening, I have opened a tracker [1] for >> issues which need to be resolved before newer udevs can go stable. >> >> Does this answer any fears about trying to force an untimely >> stabilization? > > Maybe we should create a new mailing list, say, > gentoo-usr-discussion@lists.gentoo.org. Just to clarify, you are trolling right? -A > > -- > Best regards, > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny