From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SrWNI-00022T-7m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:41:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2EF39E058F; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0F3E0525 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhp26 with SMTP id 26so1842410yhp.40 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:40:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=4p7s2QZBgvd9G22xUfx1IhzXhMVf33w43uZXstrdz+s=; b=b5GhJAtwMog7nXf4MToeJZfKB0XZabquEx5JwJuLynRfFhFXVFJGbE8JS9YzOjydNs ri8mm05b36Ymd+URvsCBqwvibu5Gd04ZC7JanLZZsXCnjV1cUX5bXFKMzz+yFJ3XHrO5 mtubpyJElw18hkUvmzLQaJLd7BR6/Brw7d6KzKI656aey6IXFNBQNXnjNhgab8XoAfEe qRlByUrVKzeBAyIg9QK8ANTEzfg9sHmvh1cTGg9CtTIAqtj8/knUGS0L0h6uzrzMihKO oN1OVY7i3k8aGX4mcQ+6uUVkh8FhIYi+6D72OCcaYDvZADYR2TIDdl6bk+n9VFB5KcX0 8c6g== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.181.161 with SMTP id dx1mr2457883igc.52.1342626003485; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com Received: by 10.231.200.212 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 08:40:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5006D73E.2070704@gentoo.org> References: <5006D73E.2070704@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:40:03 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CJLzCnZ5K38TH_SQS58j5JvptDI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch still no helper function? [from eutils.eclass] From: Alec Warner To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4PxDlgnXTfQth2AF16FXR05becY0xT0cfOuRg1wzJMSgI9LBqFQKSW0kGMg/MIO6biKEZ X-Archives-Salt: 98a8c6a7-d5a5-4788-9af5-bbfebe36fad7 X-Archives-Hash: 6005f5bd53fd9130612f9bf5d7168c6d On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:33 PM, hasufell wrote: > "epatch" is so widely used and basic that I wonder why it's still not > implemented as a real helper function. > Because then its harder to change, it must be in PMS, otherwise you have to do things like test which version of epatch the package manager provides....sounds a lot like EAPI :) -A