From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20CE13800E for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1659E02CE; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D0AE0262 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhp3 with SMTP id 3so2701680yhp.40 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:43:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=gZbMQu+wPEvZYJfC4njTl+Bxqxjex7iOv+8flP3odNU=; b=YyRyKK6buccg/MFGLXSYkMc2szZbEcBTPgyPQuulQW8auHkfjC3WHuOO5gywkp62FB F73P0QR+6dkU+EaXfENFeLcmmMN5kUg1l8S94wuF6dVrC5+WuS9sHLV5DdPREr71qtVt MzzDg3cqfKZE7uUZ/1BI4rOloauXIw9J8QG89c+2j0mJbuXMFbNYNGFTwNSakQqVkVDQ 8l6G4YfTsgbMspzX74LLHHVgPyNbtE02nw8bMA3HAgElfT9gcGrEaw7P0III+c4GLsfw hLxN38VfnZErArLDtTwaL64f7TOmuv0oJ+T6yT7fL/obXc7X99h6YDo1e/Ai964Zy5xn 6dBA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.148.69 with SMTP id q5mr2476331icv.0.1344725028363; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com Received: by 10.42.151.138 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:43:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5024EC6C.3070300@anche.no> <1344600203.17434.3.camel@kanae> <20120810162127.493a455a@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <50256B3D.3040101@flameeyes.eu> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:43:48 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: z_yFy6QLQZP6lY-luRXoN3wYjwM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] SRC_URI in metadata.xml From: Alec Warner To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlypzRiLQPxNZEsDeC57VfS9Vpvd3Ru6Fr1/sGAlXjaBQQ8k+UkfeNUijn0fbU6TLYIZV7E X-Archives-Salt: 8a8d9570-2007-4628-8b2b-f18398b3ae87 X-Archives-Hash: e9cca8e5196f2da11b272976b81ae095 On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Corentin Chary wrote: > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 > wrote: >> On 10/08/2012 13:05, Corentin Chary wrote: >>> Right, our proposal is not here to replace SRC_URI, it's here to fix >>> the cases where SRC_URI can't be sanely used to guess new upstream >>> versions (strange mangling rules, unbrowsable directories, etc...). >> >> Yes I guess Jeroen was just saying why we shouldn't abandon it as Gilles >> proposed. >> >> FWIW for the rest it feels right to me. Although this starts to add up >> to the reasons why at least metadata.xml should be validated by schema, >> and not DTD. > > Maybe .. We plan to use to > avoid editing metadata.dtd (for now). > What do you think about format propositions ? Current format looks > like what was given in the examples, but mgorny feels that something > more xmlish would be better. If you want metadata.dtd patched; please file a bug against www@ and someone will look at it (you may have to poke us a few times... ;)) > > -- > Corentin Chary > http://xf.iksaif.net >