From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 203E11382C5 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5106DE0874; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FEF5E086B for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 17:50:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id n24so13646980ejd.0 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 10:50:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gentoo-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=EwR61XrpKAblpRdJ+9YA2EuwwpZprAM/ZSkxxjsWgqg=; b=XBDVLAysEMs7QCEaZ5AU3hSQelFKBVXmz2S8CaB0zvkVjtPBnsmhb0sUq9IiC8xxfl Zh0sus3dz4V74c2cfrgN46J2n0gkslmNpSGTmjGfyBvLB76JUzUFz71i8NJu5XFC+pUq YYHj9zYTG6w7PL56I4MRO3iBbXi1sPCHxQbsxmv3iqRQlkZwJzdCn0jKXP1/Yb27Jajy WEM2ww9Tt+EdDkQzol6CVWuXFsCNW1MsM8jXWXuyBER+D5F/P/eBZJAOOY36TInmLL47 POIkfP4SF3CSs5AFNydq5QvjdUZe3zo773iLCWyfxWx7HWC0mwm4nh2VGWsuj6NNlnzf yrWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=EwR61XrpKAblpRdJ+9YA2EuwwpZprAM/ZSkxxjsWgqg=; b=UXQfiADy1O2yirJhbCna0KVM5dQVpiwXJLRrVCGD0dIw9ie4Iot5/mTFRugNPCkMSI 7Sf6PgMGiiJi5dTtA7GTnGpRVFclpcoeHAo7hL+Yygalm73ywekU7f5I6cPpKQ60JHg9 pIFgVoUJ2j/R/D3xoTNnmMfTrP6SKaqIEA0jV4kKzs+iijtgEeGSC+RSjbHFFKRo6rhj fKx007rnGhCx5kcePwFDqgJHVlR5BfiVP2qC+Fb1JT64lTEGtJmqT8oxMkLiEkDEOLTH YT1SBNO716E0QoJV9SH8T9OXTSOt/SUFRJkpvGOXPMORMZPonvhwkgnC2OWwIozgvsKQ gQJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GTUjmeTNWGuBMFX3DU69pCSU1Jeclm6D49DDeasNivZQj3u9H 4dUy7ex2Oy4oYTefHpi7Anj/kKsV6db7W1F3uyS3T0ZfGFQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6pAdrjm2NImYuUEK/fH3qj4LrYhzBzZ7fNlNE/SU/P92/LodeAAtZyKmbkmUK9rQIfDbh5G2yS0vswGNKlvk= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2507:: with SMTP id i7mr5877266ejb.419.1591120255126; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 10:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Alec Warner Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 10:50:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests To: Gentoo Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009a535d05a71d8d6f" X-Archives-Salt: 79766168-ecb4-4176-9e1c-25b5faba4ac6 X-Archives-Hash: 22b91df8fd7c5dbe0e2093545a8b47c5 --0000000000009a535d05a71d8d6f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:44 AM Mathy Vanvoorden wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry I'm a bit late to the party here but was behind on my emails. > > Op wo 27 mei 2020 om 05:25 schreef Alec Warner : > >> The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting >> together demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit and >> so on. >> >> > I didn't see in the email chain any mention of the Atlassian tools. Can > these be considered? They offer free licenses for open source projects and > I think that most of the requirements are covered by BitBucket > (repo-hosting, repo-serving, code review and pull requests) and Bamboo (CI). > I inquired about this generally on the nfp list in May: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-nfp/message/0142bac838ed7cb356e58447c6ee20b0 The conclusion was that the software needed to be released under an open license (preferably FSF / OSI approved.) So for example, Gitlab CE is OK (its an OSI approved licensed) but Gitlab EE is not. The source for Gitlab EE is open (I can go read it) but it's not freely available. > > If desired I can setup a demo and/or help maintain the tools, this is my > day job and for those who care about these kind of things I am Atlassian > certified. > > Here is more info on their licensing for Open Source projects: > > https://www.atlassian.com/software/views/open-source-license-request > My understanding is that this is a binary-own download that, once installed, we can request a license to use. We won't have the source code at all and the license is not free. I don't think it's possible for us to use this software in Gentoo for this reason. -A > > br, > Mathy > --0000000000009a535d05a71d8d6f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:44 AM Mathy = Vanvoorden <mathy@vanvoorden.be> wrote:
Hi,

Sorry I'm a bit late t= o the party here but was behind on my emails.

Op wo 27 = mei 2020 om 05:25 schreef Alec Warner <
antarus@gentoo.org>:
The TL;DR is that a crack team of infra-folks[0] have been putting toget= her demos of CI services and things like gitlab / gitea / gerrit and so on.=


I didn't see in the email chain any mentio= n of the Atlassian tools. Can these be considered? They offer free licenses= for open source projects and I think that most of the requirements are cov= ered by BitBucket (repo-hosting, repo-serving, code review and pull request= s) and Bamboo (CI).

I inq= uired about this generally on the nfp list in May:

https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-nfp/message/0142bac838= ed7cb356e58447c6ee20b0

The conclusion was = that the software needed to be released under an open license (preferably F= SF / OSI approved.) So for example, Gitlab CE is OK (its an OSI approved li= censed) but Gitlab EE is not. The source for Gitlab EE is open (I can go re= ad it) but it's not freely available.
=C2=A0

If desired I can setup a = demo and/or help maintain the tools, this is my day job and for those who c= are about these kind of things I am Atlassian certified.

Here is more info on the= ir licensing for Open Source projects:

=

My understanding is that this is a binary-own= download that, once installed, we can request a license to use. We won'= ;t have the source code at all and the license is not free. I don't thi= nk it's possible for us to use this software in Gentoo for this reason.=

-A
=C2=A0
=
br,
Ma= thy
--0000000000009a535d05a71d8d6f--