From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59127-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D83198005
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:27:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83B83E062D;
	Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:27:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F195E05D9
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:27:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so2100884vba.27
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to
         :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=f3GTgljwO9B9Dpjbe5M3+O7ahYjYKgnPyJnrugDk9Ws=;
        b=jMABR972qBqnDgQQPULjZybQlHOwyUeOGccPckwFeB1eRGATE3TkvsfJJQX3xDs1MT
         fK/9CoUx/js8Cqsu8pP4JWSO4LS/utbTRvIBGQYMMKVFt9fsApeaPLMC4zfqSvhjAswc
         5bzR9QX2hOufJrxcdYcfLRvTy28JM+Ffoj2x9z86r0Y+k/OdA5DIBUxbCHxXCbWMjPCr
         EcUvjkCvy6vT1xXS3X7fTZriSrmqWUArEEXs5XCboL2ceXbj6n9xZw9ldBlONtW1dYdI
         T3nzVGSLbrbA05oGu/vHNnwaWfMlgFcokCt2MunOf+2Gkdn+e+7TF6Wf2LVedMwZy/uU
         izAw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.17.104 with SMTP id n8mr5399159vdd.12.1363073233587; Tue,
 12 Mar 2013 00:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com
Received: by 10.220.4.78 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [75.147.136.182]
In-Reply-To: <201303120812.12605.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
References: <CAGfcS_njN_z=jOC5Tzn-tRH9qsfZoGcL44XU-NzrSdmGHeNqug@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGfcS_mDbefEb5zpR2wU_XJ6adrUf1pQPbBrqyGot4r7Tg72CQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGfcS_mY932pOF3-0vNCeaoHd-217FKCPna9qb5OmAN5-F5rxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201303120812.12605.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:27:13 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5WFg_xhALpKXfztbz8nX6TN6wwk
Message-ID: <CAAr7Pr9Y+2JB9TxhQk0UwpA1JKeHQAO8jrW+hzV0K-PeoTPHhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Forming Gentoo Policy - Copyright Assignment and Attribution
From: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmR5elPyMIxYYH3X6jfBEuodLzigOk634Nb4l3XX/unrQlymT6FeajfZpZ/h2yJ6mwMXS8W
X-Archives-Salt: 1773364c-c39d-48ac-85a3-c91206c63e3e
X-Archives-Hash: 305c8840c9bc712719436ea62b80bb49

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
<dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 12. M=C3=A4rz 2013, 00:12:43 schrieb Rich Freeman:
>> So, clarification now that I'm back at a keyboard...
>>
>> DCO is mandatory, and is simply a declaration that the committer has
>> checked and the new code is distributed under the license chosen for
>> the project (see original email for details, but generally
>> GPL/BSD/etc).  The Linux kernel is the main model for this.  Since
>> Gentoo is not always being assigned copyright we need to have a clear
>> declaration that the code is available under a suitable free license
>> so that we can further distribute it.

If you read earlier in the thread, you will see an example of a DCO.
My naive understanding is that a DCO helps shore up the legal defense
the foundation may have when inevitable violations occur.

A DCO is mentioned in step 12:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=3Dlinux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=3Dblob=
;f=3DDocumentation/SubmittingPatches#l298

>>
>> FLA is optional, and is essentially a copyright assignment (or
>> reasonable facsimile in certain jurisdictions designed by the FSFe).
>> KDE is the main model for this.
>
> Which obviously means, now if everyone signs a KDE with GPL'ed key and se=
nds
> it with SPF to TGF (The Gentoo Foundation), everything is IPO. (In Perfec=
t
> Order.)

http://fsfe.org/activities/ftf/fla.en.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributor_License_Agreement

>
> Seriously, could you repeat this for laymen and non-americans?

Hey it all makes sense for us Americas, its you Europeans that make
stuff all complex :)

>
> --
>
> Andreas K. Huettel
> Gentoo Linux developer
> dilfridge@gentoo.org
> http://www.akhuettel.de/
>