From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-66513-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809051392EF
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 20:35:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18B9BE0817;
Mon, 7 Jul 2014 20:35:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f173.google.com (mail-vc0-f173.google.com [209.85.220.173])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F68DE07D3
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 20:35:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id lf12so4462959vcb.4
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 13:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=VPiV/raLGS3rNkemx84lbC0+fZVctxLgcvAoc+dRjA8=;
b=fFNDXPCvP2xtS3r1etRA2L6XYcaYmXxjJhmHNtQRMku3Edr2NwyUYTzQZwyGHpLk5q
eJ7cLQSwJytCmRXE+Rp31k6Pyz0mZ27PX3Rlz77Go5FOfm5Xw2vW8W2jUl3eEgWfi0uQ
x/fYVS9AnoGSGynRGbXUjP//eGj7EGO0RYcnNblxvC1Gmj7CRReMY3ZGuc3tSgNLYlZM
06KWwgCc99dr0SoktcsTbiG341+Zj8Mb+WjIALf9qejIVxdECCGOkodca66wIx+BQ4N0
KdmcrG6rA09u2rMpnmJXXYoCTiEW0hET8eWpRJFSBSfQuEAZsKRgTtgUcKfJOFPUAEts
l7Eg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkM75HaFKaYDsnp3abg8P+eSPFrxri5pvc5OFgusaW3ZLcsqflaBfIhWWpH0NBqx9qZLr+p
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.188.199 with SMTP id gc7mr29630106vec.4.1404765332104;
Mon, 07 Jul 2014 13:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com
Received: by 10.220.221.141 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2620:0:1000:3001:9dfe:ff5d:5de9:1d98]
In-Reply-To: <lpe9d6$os0$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <21430.29481.773070.678302@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
<lpe9d6$os0$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 13:35:32 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: v5pjAYBSRJ0IebSWm2D2wtf_Lmo
Message-ID: <CAAr7Pr9TjG_Hc-4mOVpVh7KWk4Z8FnABB5nPovnvZanbWLeVdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Standardise the variable for including eclasses
only once
From: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5db99e9cfc6404fda06a19
X-Archives-Salt: 4b2d14da-1346-4f4e-af14-3f08861d0ae2
X-Archives-Hash: f5a2de0143c3879b6e2eb8913355b690
--047d7b5db99e9cfc6404fda06a19
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Michael Palimaka <kensington@gentoo.org>
wrote:
> On 07/04/2014 07:26 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > I have no strong preference for the variable's value. Is testing for
> > a non-empty value sufficient? Then we should assign something simple
> > (like "1"). If not, any string that is sufficiently random (like the
> > one used in eutils) should be good.
>
> I believe vapier introduced the original check and random value, so
> perhaps he knows.
>
I forwarded this thread to him. It was a holiday for America over the
weekend, so perhaps waiting one or two days for his reply would be
appreciated.
-A
--047d7b5db99e9cfc6404fda06a19
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On M=
on, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Michael Palimaka <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=
=3D"mailto:kensington@gentoo.org" target=3D"_blank">kensington@gentoo.org</=
a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"">On 07/04/2014 07:26 PM, Ulri=
ch Mueller wrote:<br>
> I have no strong preference for the variable's value. Is testing f=
or<br>
> a non-empty value sufficient? Then we should assign something simple<b=
r>
> (like "1"). If not, any string that is sufficiently random (=
like the<br>
> one used in eutils) should be good.<br>
<br>
</div>I believe vapier introduced the original check and random value, so<b=
r>
perhaps he knows.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I forwarded this thre=
ad to him. It was a holiday for America over the weekend, so perhaps waitin=
g one or two days for his reply would be appreciated.</div><div><br></div>
<div>-A</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div><br></div></div>
--047d7b5db99e9cfc6404fda06a19--