On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 07/04/2014 07:26 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > I have no strong preference for the variable's value. Is testing for > > a non-empty value sufficient? Then we should assign something simple > > (like "1"). If not, any string that is sufficiently random (like the > > one used in eutils) should be good. > > I believe vapier introduced the original check and random value, so > perhaps he knows. > I forwarded this thread to him. It was a holiday for America over the weekend, so perhaps waiting one or two days for his reply would be appreciated. -A