From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SDRjT-0005Sk-97 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:38:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06D6CE088D; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE902E0521 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so151988wib.10 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:37:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:x-gm-message-state :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FJyA7PEcTZ7627ykla1UmJwB55zzpK/DrPHeOxggwJU=; b=NtcN455qsX7stBBBjjk0YY1Z/uyemrQHiscAE2abeSlLrbGs09liYQXq7H2SL/fI3m /kJUYmx+N8sZiVToMyiy4f06T+tYfve6vB7X/W51iFIA3Uf7fz964Aq32FgeipHyc1BK bNy4yacDqupUCXMlK0FGbrcM7nzxVluGSw4zfRMATn+62nu+91BRZXYbzoVR5V2hdbYL BScvpd3CeCXbHc/qDOdd+ahEI2pig5WAeIc+5M8LHpTzUMlLQRRP/vZlddbDOZxxGXM0 8asFONBbXkNzeqSm8wV3lVmVdYQ4vfgvKMKdwUOIfrC1p2UyDc4P9Gn8WGXUkcAVbSMn Bh/g== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.102.129 with SMTP id fo1mr1480125wib.6.1333075035622; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com Received: by 10.227.5.138 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:37:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120327200359.GB6987@linux1> References: <4F70A285.3090401@gentoo.org> <4F71DA6E.6000000@gentoo.org> <20120327200359.GB6987@linux1> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:37:15 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: G94aotPGq6mUeA3Eyc7iCjmCSaA Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] automated bug filing (i.e. pybugz) failing because of missing token From: Alec Warner To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlpmJ6GX4NlLkES06yYO5EjMrpRJUjDDvNXgJPRUC59suNcRj5Ee2Qdh6xxfkomV6dFWFAA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: e9ba00a9-50a8-42c0-8309-bb4ec4775dda X-Archives-Hash: 4cf8f1c62c741135f22e7582683b63df On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:19:10PM +0200, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wrote: >> On 3/26/12 7:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." >> > wrote: >> >> I posted this issue here because it's not obvious what to do with it. >> >> That version of pybugz worked for me before (20 February 2012). >> >> >> >> Any ideas? >> >> >> > I'm guessing it was broken by the upgrade from Bugzilla 4.0 to Bugzill= a 4.2. >> > >> > I think you should file a bug for pybugz. :) >> >> Right, and indeed I've found existing >> (there is patch inside). > > That is now merged into pybugz-9999, but it had nothing to do with the > bugzilla 4.2 issues. > > I will see what else I can come up with, but patches/suggestions are > welcome. > > William > My plan is to add support for the jsonrpc api, which I was going to do this weekend. -A