From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAA8138AC3 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 306ABE0586; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CEF4E052E for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fr13so3270525vbb.3 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:14:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=et+2qvpfzmR+SXQj2mE+aVATeGplp0YRvmjwG+JCK8k=; b=ObEMDh80nkJNctBHR2MRVb0nJHtgCFdjoDkiVg0w+CoeLyFI4cbPujy6qqIgmJdsnC jUqJl9HmluLJ4f6/u5rO4lRkY4x2zDoAn/XALVzvx/j/1GcYl6L4jFd13YmInRt/BX2X Rql2zISEkKJihWYeqhI0HFnbg0JaCNykrDPthN4d4acslN7YPNMsMNVuj0WH/KT7fJpw kG1XLxttYBwkssN68SFG+laxqROpxzVkmKC6y3PUD7yQFuIUy9RpmIZ1oZGe1fVA7xbf 3R06CrU02DSJwCJJe/feb1HnfJlUQG0vaa3MNFsAgY0ZS3cfgIoaKdIrRnlpqUlCtkVz 0OvA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.234.234 with SMTP id uh10mr13128656vec.37.1361135668122; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:14:28 -0800 (PST) Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com Received: by 10.220.187.132 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:14:28 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [75.147.136.182] In-Reply-To: <1876970.ovCtsDMXQe@devil> References: <2415518.JM1V4B20yx@devil> <51213130.7000301@gentoo.org> <1876970.ovCtsDMXQe@devil> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:14:28 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _zCaBptRFHvCAsHiicDsMpCX1EU Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo From: Alec Warner To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQleJ4NhIdSmhZISLX/wu1miBWswsJfiCXxR6CiZFWY5ZKML848pgXAjuQrc+frFoqPtr2YG X-Archives-Salt: 9e3e82bf-5573-416a-b522-0ecdea4804d4 X-Archives-Hash: 439315e3316ff86c475394b2f151ad04 On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On Sunday 17 February 2013 19:36:16 Markos Chandras wrote: >> First you need to tell us what arches you think they are considered >> 'minor' and/or understaffed so we can finally document that. Then, in >> my opinion, the ideal approach would be to just drop the stable >> keywords for them. > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/index.xml#doc_chap4 > I don't see project page for: m68k, sh, s390 > > > 20:41 expn m68k > 20:41 m68k = vapier, > 20:41 expn sh > 20:42 sh = vapier,matsuu,armin76,ago, > 20:42 expn s390 > 20:42 s390 = vapier,armin76,ago, Afaik sh and s390 were both vapier-driven projects. I'd recommend chatting with him as to whether they are worth salvaging. It is not clear to me why you would email the -dev list about these arches, vapier is pretty responsive over email and irc. -A > -- > Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at- gentoo.org > Gentoo Linux Developer >