From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90461138247 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B50DAE0E65; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com (mail-wg0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5E63E0DFC for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:24:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id y10so6403623wgg.10 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 17:24:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=He+BJOQBahRtI8X63YjCxgTgDYZ0qPrXwMwqvOOZInI=; b=J/DpCCwpIMC1SZht1X+w9+O0JStDKSH5n0FWIoOms7Tu1N0opXjbK0W1svcpSzAise 8rfc8wOnqpycivSPLL77iWjevmCE0/EM8Ifpen1jYPnSDqu93JcHq1hQvsKpbEIh0AK1 3wQW1c1DFII4qnORtIzrhWU2MNlPvUFVAiNDi5Ye9fwDi2r1hE93ZJE/b5hNFHI9n4ln JmtPRUU5qa+KmGz72Dfpvn7/ywY9xlDV9YuM7CtO5VDjvxI9+LpRbh6OCQ6Xre5fwrPi MBJpah2Ilv7KaWZXnIQFLFXP4HrcxtRP2FbaqtKkyMHCsD9BBQ25Y7dYoAtVGhRqbD+K LxjA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmnyUtot0nCX0za8tjzMcaeF+XjTmrJQM5M1b55FtlERU6EHIzeadwHAY+YoR395bhwzjm/ Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.236.9 with SMTP id uq9mr11816285wjc.31.1390181070195; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 17:24:30 -0800 (PST) Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com Received: by 10.216.170.129 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 17:24:30 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [173.8.165.226] In-Reply-To: <20140119050224.GA7898@laptop.home> References: <20140119050224.GA7898@laptop.home> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 17:24:30 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: eksiXry_ZcZdVMqb2OdfkRoXKwI Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights From: Alec Warner To: Gentoo Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01493de0dce16f04f05cc0e7 X-Archives-Salt: 718205cd-1846-4cf9-8988-52ef9faca31d X-Archives-Hash: c449713f15d2a20a74d6cd05310f818a --089e01493de0dce16f04f05cc0e7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:02 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I would like to bring back for discussion an old patch to glep 48 [1] > which was suggested by Jorge [2]. > > That patch evolved into this one [3], and in the council meeting back > then [4], parts of it made their way into glep 48, but the rest seemed to > be forgotten. > > Attached you will find an updated version of this patch taking into > account the current version of glep 48. > > This is nothing new; the qa team has requested that commit rights be > suspended before. I am just proposing that we actually add the parts of > the old patch to the glep that spell out when and how this can happen. > > Thoughts? > We almost never suspend commit rights. I'm not really finding a situation where this is necessary. Certainly not in the streamlined fashion proposed here. -A > > William > > [1] http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:48 > [2] > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/msg_ac161677a6e06a8647e16420eeae8d47.xml > [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-qa@lists.gentoo.org/msg00144.html > [4] > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20110608-summary.txt > --089e01493de0dce16f04f05cc0e7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= at, Jan 18, 2014 at 9:02 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org><= /span> wrote:
All,

I would like to bring back for discussion an old patch to glep 48 [1]
which was suggested by Jorge [2].

That patch evolved into this one [3], and in the council meeting back
then [4], parts of it made their way into glep 48, but the rest seemed to be forgotten.

Attached you will find an updated version of this patch taking into
account the current version of glep 48.

This is nothing new; the qa team has requested that commit rights be
suspended before. I am just proposing that we actually add the parts of
the old patch to the glep that spell out when and how this can happen.

Thoughts?

We almost never suspend commi= t rights. I'm not really finding a situation where this is necessary. C= ertainly not in the streamlined fashion proposed here.

-A

=C2=A0

William

[1] http:= //wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:48
[2] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo= -project/msg_ac161677a6e06a8647e16420eeae8d47.xml
[3] http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-qa@lists.gen= too.org/msg00144.html
[4] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meetin= g-logs/20110608-summary.txt

--089e01493de0dce16f04f05cc0e7--