From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-51946-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SXfSu-0005p1-Of
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 21:21:00 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85677E0AA8;
	Thu, 24 May 2012 21:20:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F7EE0ADC
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 21:20:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so223448wgb.10
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 14:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=a4w3T8TttxgIy3m5a8fzrtv5WZI2kH2hE3X9OtY5VdU=;
        b=YEJPflW3zDysjKm01xMqMfyxeHIvBP/IDsigFcyJYHYzvWbVqRtnRPFrs4ntHlBXg1
         4y2w6taLQC9/WUO85S/Qk1Uy2rpgIx6pfiBI5Tuz7YaXI5WqfIsv1X0IGSnyUtPbnXOW
         LIvn58L64A3O44ogzme3o5MlZL1qd2Q2a21MRzDeJV4XXoMtE09Lz+4ywnt6vrAQo3m0
         e+2tyakxOBaUOIiCA85ods90bVNREgbO0LvcEQyPiy4S7ElZ2w8B/ChBOkRhD1XEKlxz
         11U912eN3rOsGMz45eAWkp4dIBciygoO+d1AZh7QsfohV1ZpbpCItF2g3C6KqTrmz9Qx
         zAWQ==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.78.233 with SMTP id e9mr1859751wix.5.1337894407927; Thu,
 24 May 2012 14:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.60.167 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 14:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <36d9f4482a0b128a4fa78cdba23a71b6@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru>
References: <4FBCDB3D.1070009@gentoo.org>
	<4473416.vM7oOSmagZ@smorgbox>
	<4FBE8223.2010406@gentoo.org>
	<3485389.iLMx13MNW5@smorgbox>
	<4FBEA181.30204@gentoo.org>
	<36d9f4482a0b128a4fa78cdba23a71b6@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:20:07 +1200
Message-ID: <CAATnKFDxYy74PJFmXDXw3s0yh8Y4jYa=WbJpbyzpyd43YG-mzg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was:
 clean cut or git-cvsserver)
From: Kent Fredric <kentfredric@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: d4850772-ef5d-42a8-9d8f-63f8d6ad252f
X-Archives-Hash: 7028494bd00003c02731880ff27bc5de

On 25 May 2012 09:14, Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@gentoo.org> wrote:
> In gentoo git tree all git commits will be signed by commiter gpg keys (a=
nd
> this will be requerd!)
>
> Aaron W. Swenson =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB 2012-05-25 00:00:

Something that still confuses me about commit signing that I haven't
seen answered: How does a signed commit work with rebasing? I don't
see any flag to allow rebase to sign commits rebased, and rebasing
*does* change the commit fundementally in ways I'd expect to void any
signature.

Sure, you may not want rebasing in the master, but I sure as hell want
to use it in a branch. People who maintain a long-parallel-merge
history instead of rebasing their branches are on my personal shitlist
=3Dp.

--=20
Kent

perl -e=C2=A0 "print substr( \"edrgmaM=C2=A0 SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_=
 * 3,
3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );"

http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz