From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SXfSu-0005p1-Of for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 May 2012 21:21:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85677E0AA8; Thu, 24 May 2012 21:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F7EE0ADC for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 21:20:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so223448wgb.10 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 14:20:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a4w3T8TttxgIy3m5a8fzrtv5WZI2kH2hE3X9OtY5VdU=; b=YEJPflW3zDysjKm01xMqMfyxeHIvBP/IDsigFcyJYHYzvWbVqRtnRPFrs4ntHlBXg1 4y2w6taLQC9/WUO85S/Qk1Uy2rpgIx6pfiBI5Tuz7YaXI5WqfIsv1X0IGSnyUtPbnXOW LIvn58L64A3O44ogzme3o5MlZL1qd2Q2a21MRzDeJV4XXoMtE09Lz+4ywnt6vrAQo3m0 e+2tyakxOBaUOIiCA85ods90bVNREgbO0LvcEQyPiy4S7ElZ2w8B/ChBOkRhD1XEKlxz 11U912eN3rOsGMz45eAWkp4dIBciygoO+d1AZh7QsfohV1ZpbpCItF2g3C6KqTrmz9Qx zAWQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.78.233 with SMTP id e9mr1859751wix.5.1337894407927; Thu, 24 May 2012 14:20:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.60.167 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 14:20:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <36d9f4482a0b128a4fa78cdba23a71b6@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru> References: <4FBCDB3D.1070009@gentoo.org> <4473416.vM7oOSmagZ@smorgbox> <4FBE8223.2010406@gentoo.org> <3485389.iLMx13MNW5@smorgbox> <4FBEA181.30204@gentoo.org> <36d9f4482a0b128a4fa78cdba23a71b6@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 09:20:07 +1200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - Handling Pull Requests (Was: clean cut or git-cvsserver) From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: d4850772-ef5d-42a8-9d8f-63f8d6ad252f X-Archives-Hash: 7028494bd00003c02731880ff27bc5de On 25 May 2012 09:14, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: > In gentoo git tree all git commits will be signed by commiter gpg keys (a= nd > this will be requerd!) > > Aaron W. Swenson =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB 2012-05-25 00:00: Something that still confuses me about commit signing that I haven't seen answered: How does a signed commit work with rebasing? I don't see any flag to allow rebase to sign commits rebased, and rebasing *does* change the commit fundementally in ways I'd expect to void any signature. Sure, you may not want rebasing in the master, but I sure as hell want to use it in a branch. People who maintain a long-parallel-merge history instead of rebasing their branches are on my personal shitlist =3Dp. --=20 Kent perl -e=C2=A0 "print substr( \"edrgmaM=C2=A0 SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_= * 3, 3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz