From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE8759193 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 06:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65E6321C050; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 06:36:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f180.google.com (mail-qk0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A93721C048 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 06:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f180.google.com with SMTP id o6so28138569qkc.2 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:36:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=WScAGOF70JxK4Rq2zj9IjBPBFx4wl3u76SjxTBlB53Q=; b=WrJROKNg9Q9w8LQvwsbTl8ptNhBrYDzMZUay4gpFoeT1Gll/GnENfzzb4ygVw/o5sJ wwewicxZXGsTnVNgiuUjBvorysrHrMA8cPfyYYJUh1MOGgOULiXoLaIlTvvTUzaebbsY 8jDoZdZinDLcck9CEh2Am5X8gPCUCufMmBQDFf8isiUUvLZK+vQn6h/bnk/uKdIMk3ao RwXWCfAnkXUrYf2YWOYl01gduEEQj3W3JbRvCxjGHM55v72n+1l+iYGhAvHD6bmPVc4U 7EF7KSiN9WJkqDLp0T/o4fffcgPePrV4hgaZFTklh+R1IcSn6+OYTTPd1BaIqlfzfDlI GEow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WScAGOF70JxK4Rq2zj9IjBPBFx4wl3u76SjxTBlB53Q=; b=RPWc1sIlJRvn4Rzw0DK+4Dc/yXoZNMG3uuFNdaHP4xEyCZqoYpeNPYHVGOIGAlaazi K/wqXWhicPRb1a/AjCiq5ZTytZ1zaDxYebR/fI6xjSJe8LeHK7aK8MmYV7WzjrPtPSC9 Xa2m8/HXb9V5a8fVK/8JER4kfN0TwqNPgVXY6nagXnXDxNXTa8uluuf0uvH972uIIpJN 3wTTWVGkNaYlJfWZYwV1etwiYLKAqQph4KLzYhFv4Hm1gQmj5HqI6bhXwr0L/TLVsopM k4yPezWU0dKs/u85WASn7rKkb2C496ah0lF7o3wensfs+4M8HavKi39lbSQWBc9a/0NO khwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORlIYsrw9BBBBLrZRj5uTwEAMR23IJ1tpD9oL6dAdJ8+BUHXl6PuDJHrV4GOjHpa05NEouZGSaFSih5QA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.71.66 with SMTP id u63mr60404877qka.67.1455258990659; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:36:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.107.228 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 22:36:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <56B9E646.4040206@gentoo.org> <20160209213532.6354204c.openhs@tightmail.com> <20160210210035.02a94a20.openhs@tightmail.com> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:36:30 +1300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: "Lazy" use flags? From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: be45952a-e9a1-437a-8b4e-4c7e9617f711 X-Archives-Hash: 74b4a5a6849d04882c190fc49bd9eeec On 12 February 2016 at 18:56, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > So my USE="-* ..." (without letting portage do autounmasking) would > continue to work just like it does now, correct? I would hope so. And obviously, this feature would be potentially tenous, and might be wise to only activate its mechanics with a parameter to emerge. That is, I suggest that unless you have --lazy-use In your emerge opts, no lazy use mechanics should be applied ( or even considered ) That way, people who do want the new behaviour can stick it in the default emerge options and \o/ -- Kent KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL