From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S7Dsc-0000OW-Dk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:38:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B950AE0DD6; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7745BE0D82 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaoo28 with SMTP id o28so8960492iao.40 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:37:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jk69WQ5Ee/GF9gHcYUio8elQu9F7r5FqogXBBj41XHk=; b=QpLXQeLPUhzXM9nMMqULJVW3MwJnDXd+fI3viRtXltQLLqV/jGibHvDWVJmRGZ1RWm 44ena9JX8mqcPMBrBEf29RXtVdk0n8ab54mWeB1vnfWY0kv6lP6eqEsGd/IDJ7nLY1um ufiOonTCwNrf4DQIm5LIT2mzjksRiSFyrML9+nz07eazUUj/YMa8+ui28jbJeMBFVlR0 gHWFfvK8TpWWXa/fLVxs1cYmWpuHk3fX8SS3w8n2dSecAFO6YFvro5QxizulrQi7GBi6 fcmuZ9k4b5roTnuShVnC3t9jmPDWHCpYKTyuse0VvxlySAcqeIKl/A6e0HqDDojtrus+ Vp3Q== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.209.105 with SMTP id ml9mr324726igc.23.1331591825053; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.138.74 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:37:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120312155927.2cca0d3b@googlemail.com> <20318.11498.463319.52140@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120312171228.48c5b023@googlemail.com> <4F5E30F1.2010500@gentoo.org> <20318.14784.69603.177708@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120312180424.26ad103b@googlemail.com> <20318.15803.361859.738914@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120312182815.2d73c8df@googlemail.com> <20318.17788.250811.141624@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4F5E4739.8040409@gentoo.org> <20120312190130.0170e01a@googlemail.com> <20318.21314.5988.317980@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120312201007.68dbb551@googlemail.com> <20318.26438.217413.826801@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:37:04 +1300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD : .ebuild is only bash From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: e1c97f08-ffb9-4cf4-998d-2d4a323cd870 X-Archives-Hash: 1429b4aa6dd96e3ae4275c55685c09db On 13 March 2012 11:02, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> The previous council's decision does not prevent this same glep from >> going to the council again (decisions are not forever.) >> Some folks seem to think that taking glep55 back to the council is not >> allowed somehow (or is perhaps futile, but that is a different issue >> ;p) Having the full notes would be helpful in determining why it was >> turned down back then; I'm sure a copy of the notes exist. > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/ > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20100823.txt > Well that was insightful. As suspected,, there was a lot of people saying "Yeaahh, I don't like it", and concluding there were problems with it, but the actual technical issues still haven't been presented to us. While they're still batting for the alternative solutions, which there are known potential issues with. Or did I read it selectively? Can somebody present a real ( or even theoretical ) problem that could arise from having the EAPI in the filename that isn't some abstract hand-waving? Not trying to be a troll here, but really, I still haven't seen any. --=20 Kent perl -e=C2=A0 "print substr( \"edrgmaM=C2=A0 SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_= * 3, 3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );"