From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-74472-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DBB58973
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:56:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E350821C0A6;
Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:56:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com (mail-qg0-f46.google.com [209.85.192.46])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 031E621C05C
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:56:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b35so128408527qge.0
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:56:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=QRd7LCJ/oe6asajUK5MSklSM3tRDxRWRQnAjgzA2ngk=;
b=BMJHqt4fGkmKLqs13Yzj51qym3jIc6Bmtt8Kzl9slaW4aD874py5bhLHC5luhoe0lH
a/pLKFk/R9z6sRyJbSaLrfymIJU0tSw4JKEJQ+N4Qxwg65KKm6kqjYvqiBcGI8pV7O+Q
NiJpAJvkkGg8ZbWoB+ilw+A/bReqncTVK+WaLvpSkm5M2N2LB89rtSH+1UI6hNcPocP+
UsFQdlISIc0x7h3sMe2+BIvR+nYaMvirJh8wb/0vAsEL5OlULAQQZMnPKOgWEmRgsJeq
4y1VkBPz/eqqbVOGyYpPnqtQSrS0cFfDLQz4Qr7NoA1YKxIBUr7lMKjtSiZvxer0ITQb
q7Fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=QRd7LCJ/oe6asajUK5MSklSM3tRDxRWRQnAjgzA2ngk=;
b=EDX8RLCdS9+83zvuvVu2s/1QnIWqbSEWLqNVRjLiubTMUqc2+b6rHSLkAQ6Rjbp7k3
2B3y+993angy+1JqngG85HV0E1Vinej+GGHuFDqhenr0QuSDXiOKUjD54tnt+fB7pMHV
bvg7XSt/4thutQOcma7U2vFs/JP4p6UeQdkR/2DC4xQgbC+g4KXZcqNG8nGEmwfr1jPy
h1iNLHp7Z52n+GFUOUlXQD7FEhhOd97e4y0vppzQ5p25uH6TJgHo3mu+l1c1UPWHT6Pb
CptB9I/vWoZdvHBYQbxEFxyKuman5FGrf6IRkez9sll0vzlp2Dnm+DfAd/SJsvr8n2GH
jKlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQr7f9RyxgQPzwKQN1LFNBKEdtbICc6MRhAif/G/O7/Ea1mxNvEi2YO1VHtEQlAOjDUY2cFg/f4MMxP6g==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.94.46 with SMTP id f43mr37333630qge.95.1454972172179;
Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:56:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.107.228 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:56:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20160208224457.2c4e8e01@symphony.aura-online.co.uk>
References: <56B27F5D.4040805@gentoo.org>
<20160203234849.0d4ebc8f.mgorny@gentoo.org>
<CAKmKYaC4ZrPeZH0zjsa_n-Gyz7c=-oVM1u7hOF5ZFaBMZsOa3Q@mail.gmail.com>
<20160204102740.GA26130@meriadoc>
<CAKmKYaBvnc_PZ9i5CM5HRQ5=fOb3KsFaR1=QKtJh0MoP3Abmwg@mail.gmail.com>
<20160208224119.14a513e1.mgorny@gentoo.org>
<CAATnKFAoTvG6woN_8EW5+tSpv1d0efXP8xhgci2f213R=hDAyg@mail.gmail.com>
<20160208224457.2c4e8e01@symphony.aura-online.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:56:12 +1300
Message-ID: <CAATnKFC-M7oo+ZH8Hnx3jP01gvbBtwRPecDy+sdOLRocafqk0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND NGINX_MODULES_STREAM
From: Kent Fredric <kentfredric@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: d1dc5b1e-f2c9-44c4-ae59-57d4efa6c10b
X-Archives-Hash: 04caaaa4d1eb81d74e50e442fadf8436
On 9 February 2016 at 11:44, James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org> wrote:
> nginx is monolithic, if a package per module is what you meant.
Yeah. That's what I was afraid of. Given what you're doing there,
there's practically no other way.
Other than to tell Gentoo users that you're giving them the "Maximal
power to choose" by demanding they maintain their own nginx ebuilds in
their own overlay if they want features outside a core set, or don't
want features inside a core set, and "hey dude, just work out that
stuff yourself".
And that approach just seems anti-gentoo.
--
Kent
KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL