From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S72FP-0005Zo-PO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:13:00 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4770FE0BCC; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7759BE0BBB for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaoo28 with SMTP id o28so7970047iao.40 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 03:12:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DgN8kJoNxZ3SSc44p862Y83APkRZ35D3qQIIy/ZcwxY=; b=OGaCLmnhL5WCt8bZWO12E+lsV7YD/RaXvtswUWbqB2K6OvGX0hY8/oFJph/582kfDD debXXSML7AQ8cAFkifd71mpc3sK7KVO8dSCKbp6EC5Gvtt/swKXdvZSiVy1xfgl73gDk xDks/gconPKXz1A+HgkXiKBh5hO8k//zc6pS79RZVgP145h4xbRKgodLTPTpt+L2JsUp 4h3V4t5AQtmIVTFE7P7dgPYzqFU/wWGTl3Gytdc/CoOwRESA5wMnogUi1XRJQ7ihEba5 J8fSbXQFp/5bg9OKPnPSZnoVZY4y9ioSFMdG0ivRgpqaDtdG79XNoHlS8Vom2EY3UIcU gKHw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.144.201 with SMTP id c9mr15775976icv.29.1331547138072; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 03:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.130.135 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 03:12:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20317.50769.721982.842546@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <4F58FC55.7070005@orlitzky.com> <20120308184820.108fc30c@googlemail.com> <4F592612.6050203@orlitzky.com> <20120309060424.09cdce1e@pomiocik.lan> <4F599692.9050503@orlitzky.com> <20120309172921.281ee5a0@pomiocik.lan> <4F5A368D.2020605@orlitzky.com> <20314.14772.897891.110368@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4F5A3E6C.4040900@orlitzky.com> <4F5A4246.8080605@gentoo.org> <20120312020344.GE7579@localhost> <4F5DA0FE.1070405@gentoo.org> <20120312092711.7dbd969f@pomiocik.lan> <20120312083019.3d38ffa0@googlemail.com> <20120312100904.55b1a577@pomiocik.lan> <20317.50769.721982.842546@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:12:18 +1300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: ee58263f-2252-4d06-9f61-7cd86fca3167 X-Archives-Hash: b4b1c7621949aad1dbef1a2fde5e70bd On 12 March 2012 22:48, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Kent Fredric wrote: > There's little danger if we require the EAPI specification to be in > the first line of the ebuild. Of course the regexp should be general > enough to account for a non-bash comment syntax. > There's the obvious case of compiled-binaries where that might not be possible, but thats definately strawman stuff and I wouldn't support that sort of nonsense anyway. Compiled binaries for ebuilds can gtfo. --=20 Kent perl -e=C2=A0 "print substr( \"edrgmaM=C2=A0 SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_= * 3, 3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );"