From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1109E13877A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6BB6E08F4; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f43.google.com (mail-qg0-f43.google.com [209.85.192.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6E5E08EB for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id a108so9807098qge.2 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 02:12:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=UZSf9wULGn7WhqTbsFywv3NFU+uYuMvFBfeCpXZAKhs=; b=qA85z1ETyG5lFuVX+3m3QSFfmofhZS64B6TTzLsecs5y0ybBG6usbf9JKbyC0TlymL jTTtft96FHaZ/56RL6uIN3bAnVKaflto0G7dDIQrvemIG3fqdZASuz/TefRPgt6Un3jJ h1hpjB/Vg73r4soeS9FSNFmG7fYRjgy4Kzu7PaV6e1YCgjaut7TbICLL9Wv9HrKHFeSs L4AnyuwLTw+Wjy1NHKUg4pN3ce0cMMPkmQkr0n+UDZDBiFzu968Kv9vgmnYtaVm5wo+N 62CZ75PYkvCuInvnreVQtsAejpfMvCEgc8pqahn5BVZEGCJ9Isod0MsTR4lYQOQ6jwRG /Fng== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.89.10 with SMTP id c10mr1179098qam.51.1406625128768; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 02:12:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.44.34 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 02:12:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140729073317.9717.qmail@stuge.se> References: <53CD8BBA.2010605@gentoo.org> <53D5072E.3030305@gentoo.org> <53D51311.1070802@gentoo.org> <20140728092838.8099.qmail@stuge.se> <20140728132935.25073.qmail@stuge.se> <20140729073317.9717.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:12:08 +1200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: don't rely on dynamic deps From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3bf0021ed0f04ff516f01 X-Archives-Salt: aaa436e7-2dfb-439d-aaef-b8260b3adaf4 X-Archives-Hash: 66bd9ec1807b143bedd60e0e12466cc3 --001a11c3bf0021ed0f04ff516f01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 29 July 2014 19:33, Peter Stuge wrote: > I think the vdb can and should be updated according to portage changes. > > Someone just needs to code it. ;) > And an appropriate method for doing this must be decided upon. And that part entails >70% of the discussion dispute :) -- Kent *KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL --001a11c3bf0021ed0f04ff516f01 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 29 July 2014 19:33, Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I think the vdb ca= n and should be updated according to portage changes.

Someone just needs to code it. ;)

And an appropriate method for doing this must be decide= d upon.

And that part entails >7= 0% of the discussion dispute :)


--
--001a11c3bf0021ed0f04ff516f01--