From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE0C013832E for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 20:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34621E0BFD; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 20:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (mail-oi0-f52.google.com [209.85.218.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40BABE0BF9 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 20:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id l203so90725635oib.1 for ; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 13:46:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Bwt+gu8xv7qsvVUMg9r2eXPfMGhRAvKP8sYsGQ9eRLg=; b=JbKqsXZg03mqFl8aw8+mH9ql0SAsxhiJjVL3pZuc+Xqz0QIGg6G6urAszEnse+Mppq +2jRip/xsUz1JyuZwpVLxm6l4i0mlEaQrk3tKIPBnw8wb+NEzRE/zxchrIKxEimXZ7h6 jDKXj5eu4Ngd5I5+AWtBZCEUkxb9fZeiXjOAIF4B9s7YYyhXv42rEaJvHegpQnzj8nj9 It3bvODFgGp2G/qRnSFDjHNPLB8Vvagw7439Wq4mC53RNqSpIOegI4jkoF/akH+XFkuB 8viheRS/G6NMv/3LrbRT0VbWMsvCJm68fT3AyyUnmcMTXdiCLb4NtJFTEeQJbSNrT1Jm IQfA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Bwt+gu8xv7qsvVUMg9r2eXPfMGhRAvKP8sYsGQ9eRLg=; b=NeafdIuaYLBQMNWo3ElA8sp8maBUgWHJn/SGlZPLda2b1HL6rxkjhdgmSrtqOxJXOz hfAw8vfnXr6e6ITCvzZPAOHduMn2X0SkKPaY3oSAfKFXN4seiT9Ual7NovvRGl/OcvsJ XUwxQlPlT5EB+K7eG5znWrfjon4p2UPY0ZfJMqlQj0qKrmA4tiEt5dwEJmI/6qM3BZIt znPZAg+25KYrqoX/95fkQoxSEAI+CV0SuIr4tqWPVa2rwjwXjW39mf8WWFDVAcYmSl4Q p5/HlNrG7sek91xW5TR3Mg2w02e/7fNyPmOaah59atV4zGYQOzSREXUUAzP3TmNDoiJY cx2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuvd/roReTBtJ+SPnCSdDWM6AfU0v4E25VujvovMXyEyaJLSwj4LJ9wNtxXAcO9guOknq9W4zhASc9Hxg== X-Received: by 10.157.52.188 with SMTP id g57mr21641856otc.173.1470602801216; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 13:46:41 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.5.2 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 13:46:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: R0b0t1 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 15:46:40 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for help: python3.5 testing To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 6fa869bc-2053-4d99-8f01-5d46635e09db X-Archives-Hash: d95532c58edc9befe74f3c3c4d05d5f9 On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to make a push to get python3.5 stable in the next few > months. There are a couple things that need to happen first. > > 1. Add python3_5 to PYTHON_COMPAT for current ~arch packages. A list > of packages that need to be tested and marked compatible with > python3.5 is producted daily. > > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gpyutils/34-to-35.txt > > 2. Stabilize any packages necessary to support python3.5. A list is > also produced daily. For this step, I imagine we will create one giant > stablereq bug for the sake of arch testing efficiency, but feel free > to stabilize them ahead of that. > > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gpyutils/34-to-35-stablereq.txt > > If you have some time, please do some testing on packages from the > first list. For packages that have a working test phase, don't > necessarily expect all tests to pass; just look for regressions from > python3.4. For packages that have no test phase, a compile and basic > import test (python3.5 -c "import foo") is generally the best we can > do. > I have been using in VMs since near it came out. Main incompatibility is with SELinux markings.