public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sébastien Fabbro" <bicatali@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for changes for the next EAPI version
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 09:05:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA-OU2p2KuMdE8A99=rcaF_31hqTieTpD9Z5D6AY2rsYvq41fw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160517173418.168d2cba@gentp.lnet>

On 17 May 2016 at 08:34, Luis Ressel <aranea@aixah.de> wrote:

>
> Automated post-merge tests sound kinda dangerous to me. And I don't
> think there's any stipulation about src_test() only running
> upstream-provided test suites. IMHO, src_test() would be a good place
> for most of the maintainter-provided tests you have in mind.
>

The idea of this project is not for a typical Gentoo user to run this
post-merge test, but for an automated arch-tester bot to run them in
batch jobs. The result of which would be an update of the ebuild to
stable.
Basically CI for ebuilds: it could be implemented as a script living
in the package directory, something like a .travis.yml in the GitHub
repositories or may be an EAPI change. Debian has a similar project
[1]. Upstream could provide CI tests and sometimes they do, but we
want to make sure the package integrates well in an installed Gentoo
distribution.

 [1] https://ci.debian.net/doc/

Sebastien


  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-17 16:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-16 12:43 [gentoo-dev] Proposal for changes for the next EAPI version Pallav Agarwal
2016-05-16 16:38 ` Luis Ressel
2016-05-17  7:37   ` Pallav Agarwal
2016-05-17  8:02     ` Kent Fredric
2016-05-17  8:46       ` Tobias Klausmann
2016-05-17  9:15         ` Kent Fredric
2016-05-17 10:57           ` Rich Freeman
2016-05-17 11:25             ` Pallav Agarwal
2016-05-17 11:42               ` Rich Freeman
2016-05-17 10:01         ` Pallav Agarwal
2016-05-17 11:26           ` Michael Orlitzky
2016-05-17 11:29             ` Ciaran McCreesh
2016-05-18  8:18               ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2016-05-17 13:53     ` [gentoo-dev] " M.B.
2016-05-17 14:02       ` Brian Dolbec
2016-05-17 15:34     ` Luis Ressel
2016-05-17 16:05       ` Sébastien Fabbro [this message]
2016-05-17 16:42         ` Rich Freeman
2016-05-18  0:14         ` Kent Fredric
2016-05-18  0:35           ` M. J. Everitt
2016-05-18  0:44             ` Kent Fredric
2016-05-18  0:48               ` M. J. Everitt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA-OU2p2KuMdE8A99=rcaF_31hqTieTpD9Z5D6AY2rsYvq41fw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=bicatali@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox