From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S11eG-0000eK-5Y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:21:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66C45E0E78; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:21:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D4BE0E68 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhjj72 with SMTP id j72so1585519yhj.40 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:20:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jamesbroadhead@gmail.com designates 10.50.178.73 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.178.73; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jamesbroadhead@gmail.com designates 10.50.178.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jamesbroadhead@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=jamesbroadhead@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.178.73]) by 10.50.178.73 with SMTP id cw9mr5305164igc.23.1330114845289 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:20:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BUTLyKKXsDY3JCxoFqgXOF0umkCo1CrZjSZylW/VIGw=; b=FJ87Tr9DxgiSuiU9oasjYT6Jg7ICPJazxAkvNowumJ6HxrXT4Jr0dyScwkozBUBGWQ LeG7s9IxSnD3bnYZQ+nlPOMss4fKhqeNKY4hOnSGRDvOwmzSiMvdY9T6c7+bq7MOiyMl xz1F81cSNn52xTqbCl2su586XkEos1vxXfaU8= Received: by 10.50.178.73 with SMTP id cw9mr4227026igc.23.1330114845119; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:20:45 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.222.201 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:20:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F47CF5C.4070508@gentoo.org> References: <4F47CF5C.4070508@gentoo.org> From: James Broadhead Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:20:24 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] preserve_old_lib and I'm even more lazy To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 848a714a-1656-4c7d-b5bd-477a603a3277 X-Archives-Hash: 2d655f0f574ed63f017bc14da8e24339 On 24 February 2012 17:56, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." = wrote: > Currently preserve_old_lib functions generate two commands per preserved > lib: > > # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4' > # rm '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4' > > I'd like to modify eutils.eclass to only generate one command: > > # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4' && \ > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0rm '/usr/lib/libv8.so.3.9.4' > > What do you think? Definitely a good idea, but FYI it's only been possible since last week :P https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D326923