From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-50124-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1S64Ab-0004qA-UN
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:04:02 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E63CE0AA1;
Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:03:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com (mail-iy0-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBBBE0A99
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:03:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iaoo28 with SMTP id o28so3073768iao.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 10:03:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type;
bh=HJgihNbXSwtN9FB+qjbYfPQnwVsw89oKAIkoDtvl7xI=;
b=N7sRFT8GoPG8iczjBYc7gCu5dVub/e5ch4WRIfGfjxudBFOawhILzt6SqY9Hql36G+
O430QF+9Jw8+u45WCMBdhDGoNQVAnkGj+RcXCsM9OHP1fLqDI0UWdVp4HU9AQET4LC+o
rygm/j9YjltsZQoHi0gtCAq2ghtbH1dTLQ+hBpAlRyQ1IJIGvfeQ7vYa2g1Oemx6zpz7
p4eLhh53O7hka549Aei2EhWrGodB3SM8zYLXD9X6Lm0HV7ngwzXJFyF0j+Qh7Hap1Y5w
fpgmQX51cxEwSrdXrcnZmd+utsGHNvODV2+ieimjWiLGTkw2FUsrrOSzaEpXi6/UDnQa
wmww==
Received: by 10.50.85.227 with SMTP id k3mr4631426igz.17.1331316192382; Fri,
09 Mar 2012 10:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.228.129 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 10:02:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4F5A3E6C.4040900@orlitzky.com>
References: <20311.51166.725757.212932@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
<4F57DDB5.3090503@orlitzky.com> <20120308130310.69c3c714@pomiocik.lan>
<4F58D6A5.7070804@orlitzky.com> <20120308182844.11201771@pomiocik.lan>
<4F58F103.5010503@orlitzky.com> <20120308175345.2c4b72ff@googlemail.com>
<4F58FC55.7070005@orlitzky.com> <20120308184820.108fc30c@googlemail.com>
<4F592612.6050203@orlitzky.com> <20120309060424.09cdce1e@pomiocik.lan>
<4F599692.9050503@orlitzky.com> <20120309172921.281ee5a0@pomiocik.lan>
<4F5A368D.2020605@orlitzky.com> <20314.14772.897891.110368@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
<4F5A3E6C.4040900@orlitzky.com>
From: James Broadhead <jamesbroadhead@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:02:51 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+hid6Eof+Q_94v01FD36bCkUYLeMb+pBjk-3cObEJ2Aa1sPTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 04033fab-9b14-49e6-b53e-aebe0ba5f396
X-Archives-Hash: 7514b94a340c0faad519b3744aa320bd
On 9 March 2012 17:31, Michael Orlitzky <michael@orlitzky.com> wrote:
> At any rate, I'm now convinced that we all want GLEP 55, but with a
> different name.
I think that moving the data to the filename is probably a better
approach than semi- or repeat parsing, but I prefer preserving the
.ebuild extension, and think that eapi should be specified similarly
to ebuild revision, as a suffix. for instance:
app-foo/bar-1.0.0-r1.ebuild # EAPI0 (or the highest EAPI prior to the
new schema)
app-foo/bar-1.0.0-r1-e1.ebuild
app-foo/bar-1.0.0-r1-e99.ebuild