From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6016B1381F3 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 953CBE09FD; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com (mail-ob0-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3C76E09E0 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:20:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id oi10so3320009obb.24 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:20:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=eGPiEabMxlWFsZCaWSuADUCnYq2yNyJHyh/aG0W73jg=; b=IDzWZu3ezxY+9wkt3NXUqPsEH7fq5ck5EoBfaYQYyqlykSvLoHw515jOO7P7PYVvLU 0c4RGE+RlLGrsjDfPZn1fIuM3lj3l9ZWU2Rg28VKGt6WgJ3d2HtsHffvgliUrPzia7fr npbuQLKe+kLQZ4ezPSthzgSbZNqX1ygx67fwDxZ2X9WMmVRI3seul6/Np747Vvb1m+n0 LZs2BcFM6pshrbKdj+JCJ3SaHlTZmMKUt1w+dR6fNK4GrVnysNyl1vcfhlTucSQ5Jnf8 AZpdt++yjWFwOPVV0klfFTvJDP6TpzPhtggAPTkxncNklLU3bmzhrj5GXqy87qHYjVwa yMDg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.148.130 with SMTP id ts2mr7360016oeb.115.1366975239775; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:20:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.95.228 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:20:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.95.228 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:20:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130426085822.GA66513@skade.schwarzvogel.de> References: <20130424161606.GA1607@linux1> <51780F2D.7060007@gentoo.org> <20130424172323.GB2323@linux1> <201304241334.37807.vapier@gentoo.org> <20130424175407.GA2404@linux1> <20130424183025.GA2477@linux1> <20130425210105.GB1479@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <20130426084115.GC57236@skade.schwarzvogel.de> <20130426085822.GA66513@skade.schwarzvogel.de> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:20:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC From: Michael Mol To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e4f5a956f2204db41b99d X-Archives-Salt: da77f8fe-93c8-4dfa-8cd0-53ca01e3dc6e X-Archives-Hash: cac33987c935327ff85630170a117856 --047d7b2e4f5a956f2204db41b99d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Apr 26, 2013 4:59 AM, "Tobias Klausmann" wrote: > > Hi! > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > I'm still not quite sure what newnet does that oldnet doesn't, or > > why somebody felt it was necessary to make a new package (and no, > > let's not discuss that here). Whatever it is, ideally, it would > > reflected in the name(s). And package descriptions. > > Scratch that. After reading Rob's post, I know. TYVM. I must have missed that. What post? --047d7b2e4f5a956f2204db41b99d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Apr 26, 2013 4:59 AM, "Tobias Klausmann" <klausman@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > I'm still not quite sure what newnet does that oldnet doesn't, or
> > why somebody felt it was necessary to make a new package (and no,
> > let's not discuss that here). Whatever it is, ideally, it would
> > reflected in the name(s). And package descriptions.
>
> Scratch that. After reading Rob's post, I know. TYVM.

I must have missed that. What post?

--047d7b2e4f5a956f2204db41b99d--