From: Carlos Silva <r3pek@r3pek.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:05:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+ZvHYF68Bi6H6y5uxz64rL8-V9DeGTJgHUE-LsNU0ySSLP8mA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51786B9C.9070607@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3124 bytes --]
How about someone decide which is the best version and keep it integrated
in OpenRC? There's no best version? diff the two of them and merge what
matters. I mean, how many distros do you know that have two sets of init
scripts *just* to configure networking? I know Gentoo is about choice, but
this feels a little too much choice. What will I choose next? Someone can
decide that keymap needs a refactor and just fork it, of maybe hostname,
or <insert_some_stupid_but_*needed*_init_script_here>.
Just my 2 cents...
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina <
zerochaos@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/24/2013 07:17 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 06:34:46PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 02:16:51PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
> >>
> >>> Considering our default configuration ships sshd (an argument we don't
> >>> need to rehash here), it seems a bit silly to not ship networking
> >>> support by default. I'd rather not do it as part of the system set,
> >>> though that would be consistent with what we're doing with ssh, and it
> >>> is still override-able.
> >> To handle the various possible cases, maybe we need a "virtual/net" as
> >> part of the system set, which can be satisfied by either oldnet or
> >> newnet or whatever. The install ISO will have a basic working network
> >> stack (IPV4+IPV6). After the initial install, the admin can do
> >> whatever. Maybe even invoke package.provided.
> >
> > This would actually be cleaner than a bogus dependency in OpenRC.
> > I would probably call it virtual/network-manager though.
> >
> You can't call it virtual/network-manager, that calls to mind, you know,
> net-misc/networkmanager. That's just too confusing imho. I wouldn't
> object to virtual/net, or pretty much anything else that isn't
> confusing. The net scripts are not a network manager, networkmanager,
> wicd, even wpa_supplicant would be things I would consider to be network
> managers.
>
> - -Zero
>
> > Are there any issues with putting together a virtual like this and
> > adding it to @system?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > William
> >
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJReGucAAoJEKXdFCfdEflKSZIP/23ZA8sFNnVSUsOQcZf/nBMh
> ZJPH1eIOfalja64dJCXXlDb/0C0H5vkFBuuGJ+0ifVuulny6yDs0BV75w9x7Tecg
> FsP2y2tSQQwCwqdV6GP7bab07BbTZ1DhnEpLajVYZexr9BAk8bsQki6vdkZ7n39b
> 7iRhtiRz2mKsIK4jq+C6GG1C+QMdg1gycpij60//fJfFatgQ4CWNssMOA2j2lbr4
> gLjx9NovKJg+cenPHF8dyIuutQIcl7ehKBtYraqFYfx2QbNerkBHoeCupQ6tiuIa
> bB2DXR9Ujb0OOB50KxrwFwdW61oJ7Z7bZbPCTQJp2F78eGp4hFcUUbcN6gB75zQE
> l4ILJALegn8/mwVlP6veXZZoqOPi8ccvo0ZSQDHnQo3jyQM4kgkHnv3T8JavkjUk
> njFEOUatGsss1Fal7r7Wk39ip9OamolEqdiHJZTqa96OoOzv1lFRp5fU9y6Vi96A
> nAZ70JEpX2C3UMZ1LIImWE0LArzr+1F4qWH0fpakikRKBr2NSSTUyI7BQzc5YKwg
> +cTuaPSGmRUIeZXofhJ6Ut5LtwlAqRcf3boCAOQvj8oqWbZy2Kkd+MuUoaZcl5VM
> u5uXx4LpZfC+eeCalCfdK4DDUwhLk/mvyf4r9ZqlL0QAAg+tmKEvEHTn7Zz++Q2o
> WAb5pvOnn5BYM+HdqPpr
> =5kV9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3958 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-25 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 16:16 [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC William Hubbs
2013-04-24 16:45 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-04-24 17:01 ` William Hubbs
2013-04-24 17:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-24 21:00 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-04-24 16:58 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-04-24 17:23 ` William Hubbs
2013-04-24 17:34 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-24 17:54 ` William Hubbs
2013-04-24 18:16 ` Rich Freeman
2013-04-24 18:30 ` William Hubbs
2013-04-25 21:01 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
2013-04-26 8:41 ` Tobias Klausmann
2013-04-26 8:58 ` Tobias Klausmann
2013-04-26 11:20 ` Michael Mol
2013-04-26 16:24 ` »Q«
2013-04-24 22:34 ` [gentoo-dev] " Walter Dnes
2013-04-24 23:17 ` William Hubbs
2013-04-24 23:32 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-25 0:05 ` Carlos Silva [this message]
2013-04-25 1:10 ` William Hubbs
2013-04-25 1:39 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-04-25 2:12 ` Zac Medico
2013-04-25 18:10 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-25 18:27 ` G.Wolfe Woodbury
2013-04-25 18:54 ` Rich Freeman
2013-04-25 19:08 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-24 18:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-24 22:18 ` Patrick McLean
2013-04-26 17:27 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-04-26 18:12 ` Robin H. Johnson
2013-04-26 18:14 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-04-26 18:53 ` William Hubbs
2013-04-25 3:13 ` Alec Warner
2013-04-25 3:32 ` William Hubbs
2013-04-24 19:00 ` Michał Górny
2013-04-24 19:17 ` William Hubbs
2013-04-25 19:09 ` vivo75
2013-04-25 23:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-26 8:44 ` Tobias Klausmann
2013-04-25 16:50 ` Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
2013-04-25 16:58 ` Rich Freeman
2013-04-25 17:13 ` Carlos Silva
2013-04-25 17:17 ` Peter Stuge
2013-04-25 17:18 ` Carlos Silva
2013-04-25 17:23 ` Peter Stuge
2013-04-25 17:23 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-04-25 22:15 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2013-04-25 22:51 ` Carlos Silva
2013-04-25 23:12 ` Peter Stuge
2013-04-25 23:15 ` Ambroz Bizjak
2013-04-26 8:37 ` Duncan
2013-04-25 23:49 ` [gentoo-dev] OldNet out of OpenRC: as the requester Robin H. Johnson
2013-04-26 10:13 ` Alexander Berntsen
2013-04-26 14:14 ` [gentoo-dev] rfc: oldnet scripts splitting out from OpenRC Luca Barbato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+ZvHYF68Bi6H6y5uxz64rL8-V9DeGTJgHUE-LsNU0ySSLP8mA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=r3pek@r3pek.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox